https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=73447(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I saw the above tutorial by arildno and looked at how he defined the Dirac Delta "function" as a functional. But isn't there a more easier way to do this. I have seen the following definition in a lot of textbooks.

[tex]\delta(t) \triangleq \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{1}{\epsilon} \Pi\Big(\frac{t}{\epsilon}\Big)[/tex]

where [tex]\Pi(t)[/tex] is the gate function and is defined as

[tex]

\Pi (t) :=

\begin{cases}

0 & \mbox{ for } |x| > \frac{1}{2} \\

\frac{1}{2} & \mbox{ for } |x| = \frac{1}{2} \\

1 & \mbox{ for } |x| < \frac{1}{2},

\end{cases}

[/tex]

What's wrong by defining the delta function in this way?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Defining Dirac Delta Function

Loading...

Similar Threads for Defining Dirac Delta |
---|

I Convergence of a recursively defined sequence |

A Integral of Dirac function from 0 to a... value |

I Lebesgue Integral of Dirac Delta "function" |

Dirac-delta function in spherical polar coordinates |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**