If I use a simple algorithm to generate all the numbers from 000,000,000 to 999,999,999, is there a rule for determining how many of these digit sequences are "random"? Slightly more complex algorithms generate the irrational numbers. Are these digit sequences random? For any finite length of the digit sequence of an irrational number, the next digit is determined, not random.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

It would appear that a true random number generator must be based on something that can be safely said to be not determined by any algorithm, such as a quantum level physical process. Does this take the notion of a "random variable" from mathematics to physics?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Defining randomness?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Defining randomness | Date |
---|---|

A Defining the membership relation in set theory? | Sep 27, 2017 |

The limit of random variable is not defined | Nov 16, 2015 |

Define the function of density of the random variable Y. | Aug 26, 2013 |

How is randomness defined? | Sep 27, 2011 |

A random variable is defined as a function from one set, | Jul 15, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**