Good day!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Im currently reading the book of Steven R. Lay's "Analysis with an Introduction to Proof, 3rd ed.". According to his book, if a subset S of ℝ contains all of its boundary then it is closed. But i find this wrong since if we consider S={xεQ;0≤x≤2}, then it can be shown that S contains all of its boundary points (using the fact the Q is dense in ℝ), but it is not closed since the closure of S is the interval [0,2] which is not equal to the set itself. am i correct?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Definition of closed sets

Loading...

Similar Threads - Definition closed sets | Date |
---|---|

I Definition of second-countable | Mar 3, 2018 |

I Dense set equivalent definitions | Feb 21, 2018 |

I Directional & Partial Derivatives ... working from the definition | Feb 17, 2018 |

I Proof that retract of Hausdorff space is closed | Oct 8, 2017 |

I Homotopy Definitions | Jul 21, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**