Definition of life

  • Thread starter kant
  • Start date
  • #1
360
0
My professor at ucla gave the class a working definition of life as a self-reproducing, chemical system. Is there problems with this definition?

Well, given the definition only to work with, can we now consider gay people to be living?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Math Is Hard
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,527
28
kant said:
My professor at ucla gave the class a working definition of life as a self-reproducing, chemical system. Is there problems with this definition?

Well, given the definition only to work with, can we now consider gay people to be living?
most gay people have the ability to reproduce, but may choose not to. If you want a more interesting challenge to the definition, consider humans or organisms that are sterile.
my two cents.
 
  • #3
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
Math Is Hard said:
most gay people have the ability to reproduce, but may choose not to. If you want a more interesting challenge to the definition, consider humans or organisms that are sterile.
my two cents.
But even a celibate monk is, in and of himself, a "self-reproducing chemical system". Our body cells die and are replaced at a fearsome rate.

The problem I see with the definition is that it may include systems that are not generally agreed to be alive. Let's discuss viruses, for example, and how about the simple chemical reaction in a petri dish that generates repeating spiral waves?
 
  • #4
Beer + DNA = life.

everything that doesnt get beer is magic :tongue2:
 
  • #5
2
0
life ...hmm

LIFE - I think the definition of life - "is to do some thing - does not matter what you do or what you think, just do some thing"
 
  • #6
1,482
3
If evolution is correct, then the chemical system that is life reproduces, some of it will mutate. If it mutates to gay person, then that mutation dies. Gays don't have an affect on general populaton anyway. That's why the general population keeps producing mutated offsprings that are gay.
 
  • #7
5
0
Life is the greatest form of organism that takes shape in all its nature to reach ultimate goal of highest form to meet the consequences.
 
  • #8
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
Just as I thought. People who are technically educated in the life sciences don't participate in discussions on the definition of life and leave them to the uninformed hoi polloi, like me!
 
  • #9
DaveC426913
Gold Member
18,974
2,463
kant said:
My professor at ucla gave the class a working definition of life as a self-reproducing, chemical system. Is there problems with this definition?

Well, given the definition only to work with, can we now consider gay people to be living?
Not having any children, I guess I'm not alive either.

Bummer.
 
  • #10
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
Life's a piece of sh*t, when you think of it..

Monty Python.
 
  • #11
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
Is there any serious reason why I shouldn't just move this thread to general discussion? It clearly belongs there.
 
  • #12
Mk
1,984
3
The way this is going I think it would rather be locked.

We answered the original question, and it is simple that we can't define life all that well.
 
  • #13
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
7
Mk said:
The way this is going I think it would rather be locked.

We answered the original question, and it is simple that we can't define life all that well.
I agree. Bye-bye. If you want to continue, do it on GD.
 

Related Threads on Definition of life

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
Top