1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Definition of sine and cosine

  1. Feb 5, 2013 #1
    Ordinarily in mathematics, when you want to define a function, it is without reference to geometry. For instance the mapping f:ℝ→ℝ x→x2
    And though I don't know much about mathematics I assume you somehow proof that the function is well defined for all numbers, check if the derivative exists and so forth.

    But for sine and cosine it seems somewhat different if you use the definition with the unit circle. It seems then that all their properties must be proven through geometric arguments. How do you for instance proove that they are defined for all numbers? How do you proove anything about their derivatives and general limits of them, when all you can resort to is a "drawing"?!

    Maybe my worries are for nothing, but I still wanted to ask the question and ask whether there exists a definition of them purely in terms of algebraic means.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 5, 2013 #2

    jedishrfu

    Staff: Mentor

    There are infinite series that are equivalent to the sin and cos functions:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_functions

    look for the series definition a third of the way into the article.
     
  4. Feb 5, 2013 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    One can also define sine and cosine in terms of an "initial value problem":
    y= cos(x) is the function satisfying y''= -y with y(0)= 1, y'(0)= 0.

    y= sin(x) is the function satisfying y''= -y with y(0)= 0, y'(0)= 0.

    All of the properties can be derived from those. And those facts can be derived from the series definitions jedishrfu cites. Proving periodicity takes some work!
     
  5. Feb 5, 2013 #4

    Ray Vickson

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Rudin's book "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" defines sin(x) and cos(x) vie their Maclaurin series, then shows that series converge nicely for all x, that the functions have the derivatives they should, that sin(x)^2 + cos(x)^2 = 1 for all x, that sin(x) has a smallest positive zero (which we can call π), and that sin(x) and cos(x) are periodic of period 2π. All that can be done without any pictures at all---even without any geometry.

    Of course, then you have the issue of connecting those functions to the usual trigonometric ones, so that you are allowed to use them in geometry. (Actually, I think Rudin denotes those functions as S(x) and C(x), and then shows that S and C have the properties of sin and cos.)
     
  6. Feb 6, 2013 #5

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I heard that "sine" is the english form of an arabic word (after being latinized by monks and mangled on the way) which means "half chord".
    Geometry is always defined on shapes, not arithmetic.
    [didn't read all the way through]

    You can note that there are arithmetic relations that will also get you there. They are just fancy ways of writing out the geometry.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Feb 6, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Definition of sine and cosine
  1. Sine, cosine (Replies: 4)

Loading...