Definition of single-pole and pole-dipole particles

  • #1
ergospherical
889
1,222
I'd appreciate some clarification of this passage in the paper Spinning test particles in general relativity by Papapetrou,

1630061195931.png


The definition is easy enough to understand, but what's the motivation? ##X^{\alpha}## are the coordinates of points on the worldline whilst ##x^{\alpha}## are presumably arbitrary spacetime coordinates (of points near the worldline).

n.b. ##\mathfrak{T}^{\mu \nu} = \sqrt{-g} T^{\mu \nu}## and\begin{align*}
\nabla_{\nu} T^{\mu \nu} = \partial_{\nu} T^{\mu \nu} + \Gamma^{\nu}_{\sigma \nu} T^{\mu \sigma} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\sigma \nu} T^{\sigma \nu} &= 0 \\ \\

\implies \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{-g}} \partial_{\nu} \left( \sqrt{-g} T^{\mu \nu} \right) + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\sigma \nu} T^{\sigma \nu} &= 0\\

\partial_{\nu} \left( \sqrt{-g} T^{\mu \nu} \right) + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\sigma \nu} \sqrt{-g} T^{\sigma \nu} &= 0 \\

\partial_{\nu} \mathfrak{T}^{\mu \nu} + \Gamma^{\mu}_{\sigma \nu}\mathfrak{T}^{\sigma \nu} &= 0
\end{align*}
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
22,471
13,399
It looks like a Cartesian multipole expansion similar as in electrodynamics, where you have the electric current density ##J^{\mu}## as a source, while here it's of course the energy-momentum tensor as a source of the gravitational field.

BTW: The scans via JSTOR are much better in quality:

https://www.jstor.org/stable/98893
 
  • Like
Likes ergospherical
  • #3
samalkhaiat
Science Advisor
Insights Author
1,791
1,188
I'd appreciate some clarification of this passage in the paper Spinning test particles in general relativity by Papapetrou,

View attachment 288176

The definition is easy enough to understand, but what's the motivation? ##X^{\alpha}## are the coordinates of points on the worldline whilst ##x^{\alpha}## are presumably arbitrary spacetime coordinates (of points near the worldline).
If beside [itex]\int d^3x \sqrt{-g} T^{\mu\nu} \neq 0[/itex], you have a vanishing higher moments, [itex]\int d^3x \sqrt{-g} \delta x^{\rho}T^{\mu\nu} = 0[/itex] for all [itex]\rho, \mu, \nu[/itex], then the object has no structure, i.e., a single-pole particle. And if the first moment does not vanish, i.e. for some values of the indices, [itex]\int d^3x \sqrt{-g} \delta x^{\rho}T^{\mu\nu} \neq 0[/itex], the object has a structure, i.e., pole-dipole particle. See equations 6,7 and 8 in
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...-the-stress-energy-tensor.547502/post-3616065
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and ergospherical

Suggested for: Definition of single-pole and pole-dipole particles

  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
979
Replies
2
Views
451
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
306
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
917
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
374
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
785
Replies
17
Views
910
Replies
13
Views
843
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
344
Top