Definition of work

  • B
  • Thread starter Tony Stark
  • Start date
  • #1
51
2

Main Question or Discussion Point

Can work be explained in following context-

Work done is the amount of energy exchanged in executing an action through non-spontaneous method.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,746
4,457
executing an action through non-spontaneous method.
What does this mean?
 
  • #3
29,072
5,340
Work done is the amount of energy exchanged
This is good. The rest seems wrong. The usual definition is "energy exchanged by any means other than heat"
 
  • #4
627
112
I think the equation W=Fd explains it all. If a force acts on a body, it gives it energy, potential or kinetic, or it does work to the system.
 
  • #5
627
112
through non-spontaneous method.
Just to add, say you cover up a positively charged magnet with a thick material so that it can't affect a nearby negatively charged particle. For one millisecond, you uncover the magnet and the particle quickly accelerates towards the magnet. This is spontaneous, is it not? Was work done? Yes.
 
  • #6
Nugatory
Mentor
12,619
5,171
I think the equation W=Fd explains it all. If a force acts on a body, it gives it energy, potential or kinetic, or it does work to the system.
It's probably better to say "acts for a distance" instead of "acts on a body" (put a weight on a table and a force is acting on the table but no work is being done - unless the table breaks under the load)... But with said, yes W=Fd does pretty much say it all.
 
  • #7
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Gold Member
24,291
4,319
I think the equation W=Fd explains it all. If a force acts on a body, it gives it energy, potential or kinetic, or it does work to the system.
I think that it should be made clearer that this is the definition of work done 'on' an object and not the work done 'by' an agency. This would remove the possible confusion when efficiency is brought in. The 'agency' could be doing much more work than is being usefully provided to the object.
 
  • #8
29,072
5,340
It's probably better to say "acts for a distance" instead of "acts on a body" (put a weight on a table and a force is acting on the table but no work is being done - unless the table breaks under the load)... But with said, yes W=Fd does pretty much say it all.
I prefer the "energy transferred" definition because it applies for fields too, and it helps me keep things straight in complicated scenarios.
 

Related Threads on Definition of work

Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
994
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
14K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
2K
Top