Defition of lie derivatives

  1. suppose there is a vector field V on a manifold M

    V generates a flow on M

    suppose \gamma(t) is an integral curce in this flow

    now there is another vector field W on M

    why not define the lie derivative of W with respect to V as the limit of the divide

    (W(\gamma+\delta \gamma)-W(\gamma))/\delta \gamma

    here the difference is taken by components

    i think this is very natural from our experience in the calculus course in undergraduate.

    why we need to drag?
  2. jcsd
  3. quasar987

    quasar987 4,770
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The difference W(\gamma+\delta \gamma)-W(\gamma)) does not make sense since W(\gamma+\delta \gamma) and W(\gamma)) are elements of different vector spaces.
  4. Fredrik

    Fredrik 10,334
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The expression [itex]\gamma+\delta\gamma[/itex] (which I assume means [itex]\gamma(t)+\delta\gamma(t)[/itex]) doesn't make sense either, since a manifold doesn't necessarily have a vector space structure. For most manifolds, both the + and the multiplication in [itex]\delta\gamma(t)[/itex] are undefined.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar discussions for: Defition of lie derivatives