Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Delta function question

  1. Aug 31, 2013 #1
    in this equation why does k take on both positive and negative values? isn't k a fixed constant that can only be positive or negative

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 31, 2013 #2
    ques. not visible
  4. Aug 31, 2013 #3
    oh you have to click on the attachment and then the picture to see the equation. so the domain of the function is kx so if k ranges from -infinity to infinity then you need a +- before the integral?
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2013
  5. Aug 31, 2013 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    It's just an example for pretty unclear notation. I guess the formula is an attempt to prove the equation
    [tex]\delta(k x)=\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(k x).[/tex]
    Of course you have to assume that [itex]k \neq 0[/itex]. Otherwise the equation doesn't make any sense to begin with.

    Then you have to just do the substitution [itex]y=k x[/itex] in the integral with the distribution times an arbitrary test function to prove this formula. For [itex]k>0[/itex] you find
    [tex]\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}y \frac{1}{k} f(y/k) \delta(y)=\frac{1}{k} f(0).[/tex]
    For [itex]k<0[/itex] you have
    [tex]\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x f(x) \delta(k x)=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} y \left (-\frac{1}{k} \right ) f(y/k) \delta (y)=-\frac{1}{k} f(0).[/tex]
    On the other hand the distribution
    [itex]\frac{1}{|k|} \delta(x)[/itex]
    has the same outcome under an integral with an arbitrary test function, which proves the above statement about the Dirac distribution.

    You can generalize this for arbitrary function [itex]y(x)[/itex] which have only single-order zeros, i.e., [itex]y(x_k)=0[/itex] but [itex]y'(x_k) \neq 0[/itex] for [itex]k \in \{1,\ldots,n\}[/itex]. Then you can prove in pretty much the same way as the above example
    [tex]\delta[y(x)]=\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac{1}{|y'(x_k)|} \delta(x-x_k).[/tex]
  6. Aug 31, 2013 #5
    [tex]f(x)=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}e^{ipx}\left ( \int_{R}f(\alpha)d\alpha \right )dp=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{R}\left (\int_{R}e^{ipx}e^{-ip\alpha}\right)f(\alpha)d\alpha= \int_{R}\delta (x-\alpha)f(\alpha)d\alpha.[/tex] where,[itex] \delta(x-a)=\int_{R}e^{ip(x-\alpha)}\left dp. [/tex]

    as you know Cauchy expressed Fourier's integral as exponentials and the delta distribution can be expressed in this way (he also pointed out that the integrals are non-commutative in some circumstances). In modern times there is L Schwartz's theory of distributions. Dirac called it the delta function because he used it as a continuous analogue of the discrete Kronecker delta.
    Here is a vast generalization of the fundamental theorem of algebra

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Aug 31, 2013
  7. Sep 1, 2013 #6
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Delta function question
  1. Dirac Delta Function (Replies: 4)