Just curious how many Democrats, at this point, think Kerry was the best chioce that was out there. I personally wanted Dean to win, and still think he'd have done a better job then Kerry, though think Kerry isn't too shabby, they're just really different. Dean wouldn't have taken all the crap Kerry has, and he would have conveyed much better to America the failings of Bush without the stuffy politician stuff, been much more energizing etc. Republicans talked alot about how Dean was unelectable, about how he was too far left, too angry, too this, not enough that etc. But for all the talk they did about how poor a candidate he was, they sure as hell focused the vast majority of their efforts into making sure as hell he didn't get the nomination. It would seem if someone was as poor a candidate as Republicans would have you believe Dean was, that they wouldn't do a thing to stop him from being their opponent. I think that they were really just scared someone as genuine and fearless as Howard Dean would come along and totally sink them.