Density of air experiment, why it yields these answers?

In summary, the difference in weight between when the air is removed from the flask and when it is re-added is due to the gas particles hitting the bottom of the flask more forcefully than the top.
  • #1
Glenn G
113
12
Hi,

If you had a sealed round bottomed flask on some lab scales and you recorded the mass and then you removed all the air with a vacuum pump and then found the mass of the flask again would the difference between the two readings really be an estimate of the mass of the gas in the flask? The reason it puzzles me is that the body of the flask is clearly resting on the balance but the gas inside is randomly bouncing. OK so some of the gas particles will be hitting the bottom surface of the flask and hence pushing the flask down onto the scales a little bit ( but the force on the bottom then is to do with the rate of change of momentum of the bouncing air particles is it not? not their mass?) but equally gas particles will be hitting the top surface of the flask and lifting the flask off the scales a little bit.

Can someone please explain to me why you can use this approach to estimate the mass of a gas. My discussion comes from an experimental set up suggested by the IOP.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Because gravity is pulling the individual air molecules down, they are on average striking the bottom very very slightly more forcefully than the they are striking the top. Thus, there is a (very very very small) pressure gradient within the flask; the pressure at the bottom is very slightly higher than at the top, and it caused by the weight of the air in the flask pushing down on the bottom.

It is worth adding that when we weigh something, we usually ignore the buoyant force from the air around the object because that force is generally negligibly small. However, the weight of the air in the flask is also very small (it would be a good exercise to calculate the weight of the air in a one-liter flask, compare with the empty weight of a typical one-liter flask) so the buoyancy cannot be ignored - in fact, if the air in the flask is not under pressure, its weight will be exactly canceled by the buoyancy.
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G
  • #3
Each molecule in the flask is moving around randomly, but the average motion of the air in the flask should be at rest relative to the flask. If you aren't supplying energy to the flask, any small currents in the air in the flask should die down quickly. If the air in the flask is at rest with the flask, then you can treat them as a rigid object. The net force on the flask equals the sum of forces on every particle in the flask.
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G
  • #4
I agree with all, and I will add a different visual analogy with the idea that other ways of looking at things helps understanding.

Suppose the flask contained one perfectly elastic rubber ball with some kinetic energy. You can picture it hitting the bottom flying up in a parabolic arc as it is decelerated by gravity falling back down and hitting the bottom again without ever hitting the top. Or if the ball has more energy it hits the top, but being decelerated by gravity, it always hits the top less forcefully than it hits the bottom.

The molecules are constantly hitting each other and being interrupted on their paths, but in each segment of motion between each collision each and every molecule is being accelerated toward the bottom of the flask in a parabolic arc. They are all constantly "falling". Consequently they hit the bottom harder than they hit the top.

In net the gas does not fall. That is to say, the center of gravity of the system of gas molecules is not falling. So by Newton's second law the net force on that system must be zero. Gravity pulls down with the weight of the gas. For the center of gravity of the gas to be motionless the flask (and so the scale) must push up with the weight of the gas.
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G
  • #5
Thanks all of you for helping me out with this. My follow up question was going to be about what if the flask had 1g of dry ice at the bottom would the weight recorded still be the same when the 1g of solid carbon dioxide sublimes? From what you've written I can assume the answer is yes! Still doesn't sit well with my brain that the microscopic motions of the gaseous CO2 in terms of forces in the bottom of the flask behaves just as though you still had the 1g of dry ice just resting there. Need to think on it a bit harder and re-read your comments a few times.
 
  • #6
Not sure how to hit 'likes' from the app version of physics forums? Reckon I owe you guys likes though.
 
  • #7
Glenn G said:
Not sure how to hit 'likes' from the app version of physics forums? Reckon I owe you guys likes though.
Bottom righthand corner of this post, along with Quote and Reply.
PS You owe me one! :wink:
 
  • #8
Only seem to have +reply and send no quote or like?[emoji848]
 
  • #9
Ah if you click on the 'minutes ago' you get it!
 
  • #10
Glenn G said:
from the app version

sophiecentaur said:
righthand corner
"Sorry, old chap."
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G and sophiecentaur
  • #11
You must be using that Tapatalk monstrosity. I avoid it when I can and use my desktop mosheen.
 
  • #12
Bystander said:
"Sorry, old chap."

But she said 'bottom right hand corner' not 'top right hand corner' so what's your point? [emoji846]
 
  • #13
She is a he, with a profile. If George Sands can do it then so can I.
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G and Bystander
  • #14
Apologies sophiecentaur have only just started using the forum although I created a profile some time ago.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur and Bystander
  • #15
I did Physics A level and really wished I'd studied it at Uni instead of IT so trying to make up for it now by learning as much as I can. I've been watching Susskind's Quantum Entanglement lectures on the train recently but it's started going over my head a little. I need to sit down, make notes and cross reference with other material.
 
  • #16
Sorry about the gender confusion but there was a good reason at the time (not involving surgery, lol).
 
  • #17
sophiecentaur said:
Sorry about the gender confusion but there was a good reason at the time (not involving surgery, lol).
That's fine, no need to explain. I've always liked the name Sophie so I quite understand. If you'd chosen the name Gladys I may have been more surprised.
 
  • #18
That was my second choice.
 
  • Like
Likes Glenn G
  • #19
So I'm now interacting on phone via the browser rather than the app. Feels more intuitive.
 
  • #20
I really don't like Tapatalk but I don't pay for it so I can hardly complain. The recent browser based upgrade is very good.
 
  • #21
Looks like there's lots of functionality to lay down some pretty meaty equations if you do wished. Feel that my questions for the experts will be simple conceptual ones for quite some time.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

1. What is the purpose of conducting a density of air experiment?

The purpose of conducting a density of air experiment is to measure the mass of a given volume of air and calculate its density. This information can be used to study the properties of air and its behavior in different conditions, such as changes in temperature or pressure.

2. What materials are needed for a density of air experiment?

The materials needed for a density of air experiment may include a balance or scale, a container, a thermometer, a ruler, and a source of compressed air. Some experiments may also require additional equipment, such as a vacuum pump or a pressure gauge.

3. How does temperature affect the density of air?

Temperature has a direct effect on the density of air. As the temperature increases, the molecules in the air gain more energy and move further apart, resulting in a decrease in density. Conversely, as the temperature decreases, the molecules move closer together, increasing the density of air.

4. Why is it important to consider the pressure when measuring the density of air?

The pressure of a gas, including air, also affects its density. As the pressure increases, the molecules in the air are pushed closer together, resulting in a higher density. Therefore, it is essential to consider the pressure when conducting a density of air experiment to obtain accurate results.

5. What are some real-world applications of understanding the density of air?

Understanding the density of air has many real-world applications, such as in weather forecasting, aviation, and engineering. By knowing the density of air, scientists and engineers can make predictions about weather patterns, calculate lift and drag in aircraft design, and determine the performance of various machines and vehicles that rely on air for propulsion.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
59
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
986
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
42
Views
8K
Back
Top