In certain physics textbooks, one starts with the assumption (in a one linear and one time dimension) that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

1) x^{2}- c^{2}t^{2}= x'^{2}- c^{2}t'^{2}

I don't want to go into that. Let us start from there.

Now, if you assume that

2) x = vt, then

3) x' = 0 always because the origin is moving at v along the x-axis so that x' is always zero.

Using those three bits of information one can derive the Lorentz equations:

x' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](x - vt)

t' = [tex]\gamma[/tex](t - xv/c^{2})

where [tex]\gamma[/tex] = SQRT[1 - v^{2}/c^{2}] (I can't get the square root to come out in LATEX)

I have tried, tried, tried to do that but I cannot.

Anyone can help?

If I substitute the Lorentz equations back into the above three bits of information, it will work out but that's backwards. I want to do it forwards.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Derivation of an old-time formula

Loading...

Similar Threads - Derivation formula | Date |
---|---|

I Deriving the divergence formula | Feb 6, 2018 |

I Is there any way to derive the time dilation formula? | Sep 27, 2016 |

B Derivation of special relativity formulae | Jun 8, 2016 |

I Deriving the Lorentz formula from my own example | Feb 15, 2016 |

Derivation of Kirchhoff's Formula in Gravitational Radiation | Jul 21, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**