1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Derivation of Breit-Wigner formula

  1. Apr 4, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    The start of the derivation is shown in the attached image. I don't follow the argument that takes us from (91) to (92).

    3. The attempt at a solution

    I accept that the wavefunction of (91) is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian. I'm not clear where equation (92) came from though. Any comments that may offer an insight would be appreciated.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Apr 4, 2014
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 5, 2014 #2
    They're just using the fact that the set of functions [itex]\left\{e^{ikt}\right\}[/itex], where k may be any real number, forms an orthogonal basis, in terms of which any integrable function may be expressed. Same idea as a Fourier transform.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Derivation of Breit-Wigner formula
  1. Deriving Formulas (Replies: 1)

Loading...