How do I derive a wave function for an electron in a finite potential well?

In summary: If the potential is higher than the particle energy.In this case you have evanescent waves, because the wavefunction is zero inside the well.
  • #1
liquidFuzz
97
3
I'd like to get some help and pointers on how to derive a wave function. Since I'm not really good at physics I'm just going to use brute force, if anyone spot a mistake please please point it out.

If I look at an electron in an well with infinite potential walls. The well has the dimensions -a<x<a

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{\Psi d^2}{dx^2} = E \Psi [/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle k^2 = \frac{2mE}{\hbar^2}[/itex]

Gives
[itex]\displaystyle \frac{\Psi d^2}{dx^2} = -k^2 \Psi[/itex]

Solutions to diff equation

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) = A \cos kx + B \sin kx [/itex]

Boundarys [itex]\displaystyle \Psi(\pm a) = 0 \rightarrow B = 0[/itex] and [itex]\displaystyle A = 0[/itex] or [itex]\displaystyle \cos ka = 0[/itex]

[itex]\displaystyle k=\frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{2a}[/itex]

Now
[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) = A \cos \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{2a} x [/itex]

I also know that the integral from -a to a of the square should be equal to one.

[itex]\displaystyle \int^{-a}_a \left|\Psi(x) \right|^2\,dx = 1[/itex]

Can now be written like this

[itex]\displaystyle \int^{-a}_a A^2 \cos^2 \left( \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{2a} x \right) \,dx = 1[/itex]

Some trigonometry

[itex]\displaystyle A^2 \int^{-a}_a \frac{1}{2} \,dx + A^2 \int^{-a}_a \cos \left( \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{a} x \right) \,dx = 1[/itex][itex]\displaystyle A^2 a + A^2 \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{a} \sin \left( \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{a}(+a) \right) - A^2 \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{a} \sin \left( \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{a} (-a) \right) = 1[/itex]

Since the sin parts becomes zero.

[itex]\displaystyle A = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}[/itex]

Finally

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}} \cos \frac{\pi(2n - 1)}{2a} x [/itex]

I take it this solution is in the interval -a < x < a, in all other points the function is zero. If this is somewhat correct, is there a more elegant way of doing this, or are there some standard solutions that can be used to find a particular solution?

Edit, how do I derive a wave function if a wall is at a certain potential, not infinite? For instance an electron in the third state in a 5 eV potential wall. I know that the function is exponential declining. But how do I determine where the nodes are and how high the wave function is at x = a?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
liquidFuzz said:
Solutions to diff equation

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) = A \cos kx + B \sin kx [/itex]

Boundarys [itex]\displaystyle \Psi(\pm a) = 0 \rightarrow B = 0[/itex] and [itex]\displaystyle A = 0[/itex] or [itex]\displaystyle \cos ka = 0[/itex]

Better: (A = 0 and sin ka = 0) or (B = 0 and cos ka = 0). This leads to a second set of solutions using sines, with different energies. The total set of solutions is the union of the two sets.

I take it this solution is in the interval -a < x < a, in all other points the function is zero. If this is somewhat correct, is there a more elegant way of doing this, or are there some standard solutions that can be used to find a particular solution?

This is pretty much the standard way to do it for the infinite square well, which you can find in any number of textbooks and Web pages. It doesn't actually derive the fact that the general solution consists of sines and cosines, but you can get that from standard methods for solving ordinary differential equations; see a textbook on differential equations for that.

Edit, how do I derive a wave function if a wall is at a certain potential, not infinite? For instance an electron in the third state in a 5 eV potential wall. I know that the function is exponential declining. But how do I determine where the nodes are and how high the wave function is at x = a?

At x = a the wave function for -a < x < a must match the wave function for x > a, that is:

[tex]A \cos ka = Ce^{-ka}[/tex] (and B = 0)

or

[tex]B \sin ka = Ce^{-ka}[/tex] (and A = 0)

The functions must also match at x = -a (the other boundary) but this simply leads you to the same results as the above equations.

Unfortunately you cannot solve for a (and therefore E) using only algebra. You have to do it numerically. After you've done that you can find A, B and C. This is also a standard topic. If you do a Google search for "finite square well" you'll probably find some methods for doing it.
 
  • #3
Mhmm... when I got the cos() function I thought, all right an even function. Since the well I presumed was symmetric I thought that was a good thing. Wouldn't the sin(some angle) variant just be a image of the cos(the angle I calculated) solution..? (Considering the boundary conditions.)

C1 sin(some angle) = C2 cos(the angle a calculated)

Edit
I get the boundaries explanation a with a non infinite potential. By just looking at it: If I know the potential isn't it quite easy to determine [itex]C e^{-ka}[/itex]?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
I just found a nice series of videos on youtube and in Physics Handbook the solutions are stated for different potentials(Ep). Like you said:

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) A e^{ikx} + B e^{-ikx}[/itex] where [itex]\displaystyle k = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sqrt{2m(E-E_p)}[/itex]

If the potential is higher than the particle energy.

[itex]\displaystyle \Psi(x) C e^{lx} + B e^{-lx}[/itex] where [itex]\displaystyle l = \frac{1}{\hbar} \sqrt{2m(E_p-E)}[/itex]

By the way, thanks a heap!
 
  • #5
liquidFuzz said:
Mhmm... when I got the cos() function I thought, all right an even function. Since the well I presumed was symmetric I thought that was a good thing.

A symmetric potential has both even and odd eigenfunctions of energy. See these graphs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Particle_in_a_box_wavefunctions_2.svg

n = 1 and 3 in this diagram correspond to your n = 1 and 2.

n = 2 and 4 in this diagram are the first two energy eigenfunctions that use sines. Their energies and wavelengths fall in between those for the cosines.
 
  • #6
liquidFuzz said:
I just found a nice series of videos on youtube and in Physics Handbook the solutions are stated for different potentials(Ep).

These are for non-zero potential inside the well, and infinite outside. I thought you were asking about the case where the potential is zero inside and non-infinite outside.
 
  • #7
Thanks for the clarification!
 

1. What is a wave function?

A wave function is a mathematical representation of a quantum mechanical system. It describes the probability of finding a particle in a certain state or location.

2. How is a wave function derived?

A wave function is derived by solving the Schrödinger equation, which is a differential equation that describes the evolution of a quantum system over time.

3. What is the significance of a wave function in quantum mechanics?

The wave function is essential in understanding and predicting the behavior of particles at the microscopic level. It provides information about the probability of a particle's properties and interactions.

4. Can a wave function be observed or measured?

No, a wave function itself cannot be observed or measured. It is a mathematical concept that represents the probability of finding a particle in a certain state. However, the effects of a wave function can be observed through experiments and measurements.

5. How does the shape of a wave function relate to the behavior of a particle?

The shape of a wave function represents the probability of finding a particle in a certain state. A higher peak in the wave function indicates a higher probability of finding the particle in that state, while a lower peak indicates a lower probability. The behavior of the particle is determined by the amplitude and wavelength of the wave function.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
540
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
709
Replies
1
Views
584
Replies
3
Views
284
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top