According to my textbook, to derive the chi-square density function, one should perform three steps. First we consider a standard i.i.d. Gaussian random vector [itex]\mathbf{X} = [X_1 \cdot \cdot \cdot X_n]^T[/itex] and its squared magnitude(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[itex]||\mathbf{X}||^2 = \sum_{i = 1}^nX_i^2[/itex].

1. For n = 1, show that the PDF of [itex]||X_1||^2[/itex] is

[itex]f_{X^2_1}(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi x}}\exp\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right)[/itex]

I did step 1 using the CDF-method, so I don't need any help with that.

2. For any n, show that the PDF satisfies the recursive relation

[itex]f_{X_{n+2}^2}(x) = \frac{x}{n}f_{X_n^2}(x)[/itex]

I was thinking this could be proven by induction and this is where I'm stuck. To prove by induction I first show the recursive relation for n = 1:

[itex]f_{X_3^2}(x) = xf_{X_1^2}(x) = \squrt{\frac{x}{2\pi}}\exp\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right)[/itex].

I tried to do that using the CDF method:

[itex]

P(X_1^2 + X_2^2 + X_3^2 < x) = \int_{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2<x}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}}\exp\left(-\frac{x_1^2 + x_2^2 + x_3^2}{2}\right)dx_1dx_2dx_3

[/itex]

Changing to spherical coordinates and integrating I get

[itex]

P(X_1^2 + X_2^2 + X_3^2 < x) = \frac{2}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_0^{\sqrt{x}}\exp\left(-\frac{r^2}{2}\right)r^2dr

[/itex]

Differentiating back gives

[itex]

f_{X_3^2}(x) = \frac{2x}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\exp\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right)

[/itex]

But this is not what the recursive relation gives, and I don't see why. Although I didn't obtain the correct result, next I have to show that

[itex]f_{X_{m+1+2}^2}(x) = \frac{x}{m+1}f_{X_{m+1}^2}(x)[/itex].

I'm not sure I know how to prove that. Maybe there is another way to show the recursive relation.

3. Using the recursive relation as well as the PDF:s for n = 1 and n = 2, find the density for n ≥ 3.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Deriving of the chi-square density function

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Deriving square density | Date |
---|---|

I Derivation of the Cantor set | Oct 3, 2017 |

I Density, distribution and derivative relationship (stats) | May 15, 2017 |

I Weibull distribution derivation | May 1, 2017 |

Least Squares Derivation—Simple Algebraic Simplification | Mar 15, 2015 |

Least Squares Derivation question | Sep 20, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**