Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Classical Physics
Quantum Physics
Quantum Interpretations
Special and General Relativity
Atomic and Condensed Matter
Nuclear and Particle Physics
Beyond the Standard Model
Cosmology
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Other Physics Topics
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Physics
High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Deriving the Dirac propagator 'purely' from causality
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Hans de Vries, post: 1471845, member: 13459"] I figured out this one, just thought it was quite nice... We start with the only requirement that the Green's function of the propagator is causal in the sense that it propagates stricktly forward in time, so that the Green's function is zero at [itex]t<0[/itex]. Using the Heaviside step function we can express this as follows. [tex] {\cal D}(r,t)\ =\ {\cal D}(r,t)\ \theta(t) [/tex]A multiplication with the Heaviside function amounts to a convolution with it's Fourier transform in momentum space [tex] {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ =\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ * \ \frac{1}{2}\left(\delta(\omega)-\frac{i}{\pi \omega}\right) [/tex] The convolution with the delta gives us the function itself, while the convolution with [itex]1/\omega[/itex] is a standard transformation known as the Hilbert transform. This transformation and its inverse are defined by: [tex] {\cal H}\left\{\ \textit{f}\ (\omega)\ \right\}\ = -\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{\eta-\omega}\ \textit{f}\ (\omega)\ d\eta \qquad \mbox{and} \quad {\cal H}^{-1} = -{\cal H} [/tex] This allows us to write for the propagator in momentum space. [tex] {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ =\ \frac{1}{2}\left(\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ +\ i {\cal H}\left\{\ {\cal D}(\omega,k)\ \right\}\ \right) [/tex] From the right hand side we see that the propagator can be expressed as a complex sum of a function and its own Hilbert transform. The two halves together form a so-called Hilbert pair. The closest we find in terms of the usual propagators involving the d'Alembertian is: (From Stephan L. Hahn's book on the Hilbert transform) [tex] \frac{a}{\omega^2-a^2} \quad \begin{array}{c} {\cal H}_\omega \\ \mbox{\Large $\Leftrightarrow$} \end{array} \quad -\frac{i\omega}{\omega^2-a^2} [/tex] We already know what the denominators should be, but what about the numerators? Especially the factor [itex]a[/itex] which should be the square root of [itex]a^2[/itex]. Well, of course somebody already solved this almost 80 years ago. So,[tex] \mbox{using:}\ \ \ \left\{ \begin{array}{lcl} \omega^2 & \Rightarrow & E^2 \\ a^2 & \Rightarrow & p_x^2 + p_y^2 + p_z^2 + m^2 \\ \omega & \Rightarrow & E,\ \ \mbox{or better:}\ \ \sqrt{I}\ E \\ a & \Rightarrow & \alpha_1 p_x + \alpha_2 p_x + \alpha_3 p_x + \beta m \end{array} \right. [/tex]We can now write down for our propagator: [tex] {\cal D}(E,p)\ =\ \frac{E+\vec{\alpha}\cdot\vec{p}+\beta m}{E^2-p^2-m^2} [/tex]Regards, Hans [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Physics
High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Deriving the Dirac propagator 'purely' from causality
Back
Top