Deriving the energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field

In summary: Daniel.In summary, the conversation revolved around deriving the potential energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field using either the torque or the force approach. The dipolar approximation for the magnetic potential vector was used, and tensor calculus was employed to arrive at the final equation of U = -m.B. There was also discussion about the integration constant and the use of Feynman's lectures as a helpful resource.
  • #1
trickae
83
0
For an undergraduate electrodynamics homework problem we were asked to derive the following:

(griffiths 6.21)

show that the energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field B is given by -

U = -m.B

where
B is the magnetic field
and
m is the dipole moment.

I went about this by saying that the dipole will experience a torque when its in the magnetic field that will effectivly move it through an angular displacement such that it points in the same direction as the magnetic field (the effective angle between them is 0 as they are now parallel to each other)

so we get the following

N(torque) = m.B = m.B.sin(theta)

U = (intergral){B.m.sin(theta) d(theta)}
= -B.m.cos(theta) + C

or we can assume that its a definite integral from the bounds theta to pi/2
if we were to substitute pi/2 into the above solution we'd get

(bounds for the integral 0 to pi/2)

= -B.m.cos (0) + B.m.cos(pi/2)
= -B.m


However this would not be the electroynamics approach as i didn't use an of maxwell's equations, so how would i use the other approach?

Thanx in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is the correct way to do it.That potential energy comes from a force which creates a torque.

For the electromagnetic way to do it,use the dipolar approximation for the magnetic potential vector.

Daniel.

EDIT:Please,do not double post,okay ? If it's a HW question,ask it here.If not,use the other forums.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
sorry for the double post i just needed a quick answer

but I'm stil unsure about using the dipole approximation for the magnetic potential vector, and also where to start from.

I believe the method is similar to finding electric potential only we need a term to represent the magnetic field

I picked up jackson for a shortcut to the solution but got more confused. They brought in taylor exapansions to relate force and torque. Then by methods of tensor calculas (which is beyond me I'm only in second year) they got to the equation

F = (m X del) X B = grad(m.B) - m(del . B)

since del . B = 0
the lowest order force on a localized current distribution in an Ext B is
F = del(m.b)

and then jackson stated that
"The potential energy of a permanent magnetic moment (or dipole) in an external magnetic field can be obtained from either the force or the torque. If we interpret the force as the negative gradient of a petential energy U, we find

U = -m.B "


for a magnetic moment in a uniform field the torque canbe interpreted as the negative derivative of U with respect to the angle between B and m." (jackson, second edition p 18)


I think i might need to read up on faraday's law and see if i can get anywhere with this.
 
  • #4
Yes,that's what i had in mind.Dipolar expression of the magnetic potential and inserting it in the expression of the interaction lagrangian.


Daniel.
 
  • #5
i'm sorry you lost me with the lagrangian
- could you suggest some topics i should read up on to get the derivation
and are there any griffiths solutions sites or online ebooks that come with derivations. Griffiths is getting annoying where whenever there's a derivation there's a side note saying "The derivations are left as exercises - enjoy!"

After classes today i'll be borrowing feymans lecture notes to see if It can help with the elctrodynamic derivation.

thanks so far
 
  • #6
Did you follow a derivation with the electric part...?It should go the same.However,this time,u better know some simple tensor calculus.

Daniel.
 
  • #7
I got the solution but i was wondering what reason i should use to cancel out the Integration constant i used above. Feynman stated that there's additional energy that is used up when a loop of wire moves in a magnetic field and jackson sated that it is what's required to keep the current constant which in turn keeps the magentic dipole constant (? p186) and both books have consequently stated that the integration constant can be assumed to be zero. But why?

Also since i did get the electrodynamic solution using tau = m X B should i still post it up just in case other people face the problem in the future?

And I'd like to add - Feynmans lectures on physics is by far the most comprehensible and readable book for electrodynamics I've come across - it has no gaps which griffiths and jackson most comfortably and extensivly use to 'get their point across'.
Is purcell worth picking up for the remainder of this course?


thanks a lot dextercioby
 
  • #8
Yes,Berkeley's course is in the same explanatory style as Feynman.Basic stuff,if you compare it with Jackson,which,no doubt,is a graduate course.

Daniel.
 
  • #9
Here's my solution to the problem.

'Assuming a system of pointlike particles interact with the EM-field described by [itex] \varphi,\vec{A} [/itex],the Lagrangian of interaction in the noncovariant formalism is given by

[tex] \mathcal{L}_{int}^{\mbox{particles-field}}=\sum_{a}q_{a}\vec{v}_{a}\cdot\vec{A}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\right) [/tex] (1)

,where the electric interaction part has been neglected due to irrelevance to this specific problem.

The interaction potential energy is equal to the interaction Hamiltonian and equal to "-" times the interaction lagrangian

[tex] U_{int}^{\mbox{particles-field}}=-\sum_{a} q_{a}\vec{v}_{a}\cdot\vec{A}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\right) [/tex] (2)

Let's assume a Taylor expansion of the vector magnetic potential,allowing at most the linear term in the potential (the so-called dipolar approximation).

[tex]\vec{A}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\right)\simeq\vec{A}\left(\vec{0}\right)+\left(\vec{r}_{a}\cdot\nabla^{a}\right)\vec{A}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\right)\left|_{\vec{r}_{a}=\vec{0}}\right [/tex] (3)

Assuming a gauge in which the constant term to the magnetic potential is 0 (i.e.neglecting the polar approximation),one gets the interaction potential energy in the dipolar approximation:

[tex] U_{int}^{\mbox{particles-field,dipolar}}=-\sum_{a} q_{a}\vec{v}_{a}\cdot\left(\vec{r}_{a}\cdot\nabla^{a}\right)\vec{A}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\right) [/tex] (4)

,where i dropped the "taken at the origin",because it's understood by "dipolar".

The dipolar magnetic moment of a system of pointlike charges is

[tex] \vec{\mu}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{a}q_{a}\left(\vec{r}_{a}\times\vec{v}_{a}\right) [/tex] (5)

Using tensor notation for (4) & (5),one gets

[tex] U_{int}^{\mbox{particles-field,dipolar}}=-\sum_{a} q_{a}v^{a}_{i}\left(x_{j}^{a}\partial_{j}\right)A_{i} [/tex] (4')

[tex] \mu_{i}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{a}q_{a}\epsilon_{ijk}x_{j}^{a}v_{k}^{a} [/tex] (5')

From (5') one gets

[tex] \sum_{a} q_{a}v_{i}^{a}x_{j}^{a}=-\mu_{k}\epsilon_{kij} [/tex] (6)

And from (6) and (4'),one gets

[tex] U_{int}^{\mbox{particles-field,dipolar}}=\mu_{k}\epsilon_{kij}\partial_{j}A_{i} =-\vec{\mu}\cdot\vec{B} [/tex]

Q.e.d.

U may wonder why i dropped the particle indices one the potential and the derivatives.Simple.Multipolar approximations assume the charged particles be concentrated around the origin,that's why we're dealing with local fields (magnetic,electric and potentials).


Daniel.
 
Last edited:

1. What is a magnetic dipole?

A magnetic dipole is a fundamental concept in magnetism, referring to a pair of equal and opposite magnetic poles separated by a distance. This can be visualized as a bar magnet, with a north and south pole at opposite ends.

2. How is the energy of a magnetic dipole derived in a magnetic field?

The energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field is derived through the use of mathematical equations, such as the dot product of the magnetic moment and the magnetic field, and the torque exerted on the dipole by the field. These equations take into account the orientation and strength of the magnetic dipole and the magnetic field.

3. What is the significance of deriving the energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field?

Deriving the energy of a magnetic dipole in a magnetic field allows us to understand and predict the behavior of magnetic materials and systems. This information is crucial in various fields such as engineering, physics, and material science.

4. Can the energy of a magnetic dipole be changed in a magnetic field?

Yes, the energy of a magnetic dipole can be changed in a magnetic field by altering the orientation or strength of the magnetic dipole or the magnetic field. This can be done through physical manipulation or by changing external factors such as temperature.

5. How is the energy of a magnetic dipole related to its magnetic moment?

The energy of a magnetic dipole is directly proportional to its magnetic moment, which is a measure of the strength of the dipole. As the magnetic moment increases, so does the energy of the dipole in a magnetic field. Similarly, decreasing the magnetic moment will decrease the energy of the dipole.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
271
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
139
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
25
Views
212
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
269
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
138
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
844
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
926
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
778
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
226
Back
Top