Does the Descartes rule of signs count multiplicities when giving its upper bound for roots? That is if I have 3 sign changes, does that mean there is a maximum of 3 positive roots counting multiplicities or not counting multiplicities?
For example, [itex](x- 2)^3= x^3- 6x^2+ 12x- 8= 0[/itex] has three sign changes and three positive roots- counting "2" as a triple root.
Actually this isn't a very good example because Descarte's rule of signs does not actually "count" roots. DesCarte's rule of signs says only that the number of positive roots is at most equal to the number of sign changes or is less by a multiple of two. Here, Descarte's rule of signs says that the number of postive roots is either 3 or 1 so it is not clear if it "counting" multiple roots.
But the number of sign changes of [itex](x- 2)^2= x^2- 4x+ 4= 0[/itex] is 2 so Descarte's rule of signs say the number of positive roots is 2 or 0. And it clearly is not 0.
We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving