That's exactly right.dduardo said: They probable have a CVS type system implemented. That means that all changes are noted and the admins can roll back to good version if things go bad.
That means that all changes are noted and the admins can roll back to good version if things go bad.
The potential consequences of destroying Wikipedia articles can include the loss of valuable information, the disruption of collaborative knowledge sharing, and the violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It can also damage the credibility and trustworthiness of Wikipedia as a reliable source of information.
There are various ways that someone can destroy a Wikipedia article. This can include intentionally deleting or vandalizing content, adding false information, or continuously editing the article in a disruptive manner. It can also involve manipulating sources and references to mislead readers.
Wikipedia has a number of measures in place to prevent article destruction, such as a team of volunteer editors who monitor and revert any malicious edits, a system that records all changes made to articles, and the ability for users to report vandalism and other issues. Additionally, Wikipedia has strict policies and guidelines that users must adhere to, and any violations can result in disciplinary actions.
In most cases, destroyed Wikipedia articles can be recovered through the use of page histories, which track all previous versions of an article. However, if an article is intentionally deleted by a Wikipedia administrator, it may not be possible to recover it. In these cases, it is recommended to reach out to the administrator for further information.
If you come across a destroyed Wikipedia article, you can help by reporting the issue to Wikipedia's volunteer editors. You can also use the "undo" function to revert the article back to its previous version. Additionally, consider reaching out to the article's creator or other editors for assistance in restoring the article to its original state.