So, obviously one can diagonalize any self-adjoint transformation on a finite dimensional vector space. This is pretty simple to prove. What I'm curious about is integral operators. How does this proof need to be adapted to handle integral operators? What goes wrong? What do we need to account for? Are there any corresponding theorems I might want to look at?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Diagonalization of Operators

Loading...

Similar Threads - Diagonalization Operators | Date |
---|---|

A Angular Moment Operator Vector Identity Question | Feb 10, 2018 |

Product of Diagonals of Regular Polygon? | Mar 31, 2012 |

How do you find the area under a diagonal hyperbola xy=a where a is a constant? | Nov 23, 2011 |

Selecting diagonal elements from a matrix to make a vector | Sep 25, 2008 |

Deriving the diagonal with limens | May 8, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**