1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Did I assume too much in this proof?

  1. Sep 19, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    Suppose F is a nonempty family of sets and B is a set. Prove that B U (∩F) = ∩AЄF(B U A).



    2. Relevant equations



    3. The attempt at a solution
    Let x Є (B U (∩F)). This means (x Є B) ν (x Є ∩F). x Є F = {x l [itex]\forall[/itex]AЄF(xЄA)}.
    Assume AЄF, then xЄA. Therefore, xЄB ν xЄA. This is equivalent to ∩AЄF(BUA).

    Let xЄ ∩AЄF(BUA). This means xЄ{x l[itex]\forall[/itex]A(AЄF[itex]\rightarrow[/itex]xЄ(BUA)}. Assume AЄF, then xЄ(BUA). Thus, this is equivalent to BU(∩F).
    Therefore, BU(∩F) = ∩AЄF(BUA).
     
  2. jcsd
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?