Did the Atomic Bomb Dropped on Hiroshima Reach Supersonic Speeds?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the speed of the atomic bomb "Little Boy" dropped on Hiroshima, specifically whether it reached supersonic speeds during its descent. Participants explore calculations related to its fall time, air resistance, and the mechanics of atomic bomb detonation. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and calculations, as well as safety mechanisms related to atomic bombs.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants calculate that the bomb would have been traveling at about 930 miles per hour if it fell freely, which is over 20% faster than the speed of sound.
  • Others express skepticism about this speed, suggesting that air resistance and terminal velocity would prevent the bomb from reaching supersonic speeds.
  • One participant mentions that atomic bombs require specific conditions to detonate and are not easily set off by shock waves, implying that the bomb would not detonate prematurely due to supersonic travel.
  • Another participant notes that the air density at high altitudes could allow for a faster fall, but does not provide a definitive conclusion.
  • Some participants reference safety mechanisms in atomic bombs, including timers and altimeters, which are designed to prevent accidental detonation.
  • There is a suggestion that the reported drop time of 43 seconds may not account for air resistance, indicating that the actual descent time could be longer.
  • One participant cites Wikipedia to argue that the descent took 57 seconds, which contradicts the initial claim of 43 seconds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the calculations regarding the bomb's speed and the effects of air resistance. There is no consensus on whether the bomb could have reached supersonic speeds, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the reported drop time.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about air resistance and terminal velocity calculations, as well as the dependence on the accuracy of historical accounts regarding the bomb's drop time and speed. The discussion also highlights the complexity of atomic bomb detonation mechanisms, which are not fully explored in the posts.

PatF
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Recently, the New York times ran the obituary of Paul Tibbets who
was the pilot of the plane that dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima.
At one point the article says:

"At 8:15 a.m. local time, the bomb known to its creators as Little Boy
dropped free at an altitude of 31,000 feet. Forty-three seconds later,
at 1,890 feet above ground zero, it exploded..."

If the above is true, then a little work with a calculator shows it
must have been traveling at about 930 miles per hour if we ignore air
resistance.

This seems quite high to me. It's over 20% faster than the speed of sound
and it seems to me that the shock of going through the sound barrier
might have set off the bomb before it reached it's designated height.

So... Do the above numbers seem reasonable? There is a formula for
terminal speed in Knight's Physics text that indicates the maximum speed
for an object like this to be around 600 miles per hour. Does the air
resistance calculation seem reasonable? (The formula says that terminal
speed is sqrt(4mg/A) where A is the cross sectional area of the object.
Using information on the internet, I found the mass was 4000 kg and I was
able to estimate the area as about 2 square meters. If you want to find
the same information, go into Google and look up "Little Boy", the bomb's
code name.)

Just curious.

--PatF
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatF said:
and it seems to me that the shock of going through the sound barrier might have set off the bomb before it reached it's designated height.
Not that this helps you towards an anwer but:
AFAIK atomic bombs cannot be accidentally set off. They're not volatile the way that conventional bombs are; they need a fairly advanced and well-coordinated set of events to happen in order to work.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Not that this helps you towards an anwer but:
AFAIK atomic bombs cannot be accidentally set off. They're not volatile the way that conventional bombs are; they need a fairly advanced and well-coordinated set of events to happen in order to work.

since A-bombs are triggered by a conventional explosive (whether it's the gun-type or implosion mechanism), i would think the safety mechanism of a conventional bomb could be made just as secure as in an A-bomb if they wanted to do such.

if i recall correctly, for the A-bombs used in Japan, they had three different mechanisms with criteria that all had to be satified for the bomb to go off. one was a timer, and then there were two altimeters, one that was atmospheric pressure based and another proximity based (radar?). i thought there was the arming the device with the neutron initiator by hand, some minutes before it was dropped, was another safety mechanism.
 
"At 8:15 a.m. local time, the bomb known to its creators as Little Boy
dropped free at an altitude of 31,000 feet. Forty-three seconds later,
at 1,890 feet above ground zero, it exploded..."

If the above is true, then a little work with a calculator shows it
must have been traveling at about 930 miles per hour if we ignore air
resistance.

This seems quite high to me. It's over 20% faster than the speed of sound
and it seems to me that the shock of going through the sound barrier
might have set off the bomb before it reached it's designated height.
I have not made a quantitative study. But I suspect the answer is simply a result of the fact that air density is far lower at high altitiude than at ground level. As a result, the bomb could fall much faster there.
 
Patf, according to wikipedia you overestimated the cross section more than enough to account for the discrepancy [!], but you should have already been satisfied that your estimates had the same order of magnitude (without you giving the context of your formula, there is no reason to expect it to work at all in this regime).

As for the shock wave, conventional explosives are routinely unaffected by supersonic flight, so [even aside from the measures rbj described] there is no reason to expect premature ignition (in fact less so [as Dave was saying] since, unlike conventional explosives, nuclear explosives are not triggered just by a smaller explosion, in fact [if I may add something further for those that haven't watched "broken arrow"] such is just likely to disable the weapon; specially synchronised detonations are often required to bring about a critical configuration).
 
Last edited:
cesiumfrog said:
(in fact less so since, unlike conventional explosives, nuclear explosives are not triggered just by a smaller explosion, in fact such is just likely to disable the weapon, but often require specially synchronised detonations to bring about a critical configuration).
Dis is wot I'm sayin'. Isn't dis wot I'm sayin'? *gestures with both hands*
 
mind you these were not conventional bombs these were atomic bombs.
again a formula of terminal velocity
v=2r2(the second2 stands for square)(p1-p2)g/(divided by)9n(eta)
where p1 and p2 stands for the density of the fluid it is traveling and p2 the density of the material which is travelling.
eta is the coefficient of viscosity
 
PatF said:
If the above is true, then a little work with a calculator shows it
must have been traveling at about 930 miles per hour if we ignore air
resistance.

I suspect that the author of the article simply calculated the drop time without taking into account air resistance and terminal velocity. Your terminal velocity calculation shows that it would not reach supersonic speed. So, in actual fact, the descent must have taken longer than 43 seconds.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
I suspect that the author of the article simply calculated the drop time without taking into account air resistance and terminal velocity. Your terminal velocity calculation shows that it would not reach supersonic speed. So, in actual fact, the descent must have taken longer than 43 seconds.

The OP didn't cite their source (how terrible for a man's final legacy to be nuking Hiroshima.. all I can say is at least it wasn't Nagasaki), but yes, 43 seconds and 930mph assumes free-fall between those heights. According to wikipedia, it actually took 57 seconds.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K