- #1

- 1,313

- 0

Thanks.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Mike2
- Start date

- #1

- 1,313

- 0

Thanks.

- #2

- 38

- 0

Importance in physics thus would be obvious: Ideally, physical processes are invariant under coordinate transformations (would be a bit unpractical when physical processes depend on the coordiante system) so it´s a requirement for physical meaningfull equations.

- #3

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,183

- 1,378

E.g. it has recently been proved in algebraic geometry that rationality of surfaces is a diffeomorphism invariant.

E.g. a complex algebraic surface that is diffeomorphic to a projective plane is also algebraically birationally equivalent to the projective plane. Thus "rationality" is a diffeomorphism invariant, for surfaces.

- #4

marcus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 24,757

- 788

mathwonk said:...

E.g. it has recently been proved in algebraic geometry that rationality of surfaces is a diffeomorphism invariant.

...

sounds intriguing! do you happen to know if the paper is online

or if some website has an informative discussion of it?

BTW wonk, General Relativity (you may know all this, I haven't been reading your posts so don't know your familiarity with physics) is

an important example of a diffeo-invariant physical theory.

Since you could already be well-informed on these matters I wont venture to be more explicit except to say that solutions to the Einstein equation are diffeo invariant.

- #5

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,183

- 1,378

My new friend, I am never offended to have something overexplained so please never hold back with me.

I apologize for not checking back here more recently but the result i mentioned I believe was due to my old friend Bob Friedman, and I will find a source for you.

I apologize for not checking back here more recently but the result i mentioned I believe was due to my old friend Bob Friedman, and I will find a source for you.

Last edited:

- #6

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,183

- 1,378

- #7

- 1,313

- 0

Would this be the same as "covariant" expressions?Atheist said:

Importance in physics thus would be obvious: Ideally, physical processes are invariant under coordinate transformations (would be a bit unpractical when physical processes depend on the coordiante system) so it´s a requirement for physical meaningfull equations.

- #8

mathwonk

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

2020 Award

- 11,183

- 1,378

So the terms "covariant" and "contravariant" are used to distinguish quantities that transfer in the same direction as the map from quantities that transfer in the opposite direction. Unfortunately people in different areas of math disagree as to which etrm which emans which. I.e. differential geometers and hence physicists are all alone in using "covariant" for opposite direction transforming quantities, whereas everyone else uses "contravariant" for that.

Now if you are only interested in invertible transformations like coordinate changes it does not matter quite as much, since you can always use the inverse transformation to transfer your quantity, but it is till extremely confusing.

Share: