- #1

- 240

- 0

[tex] \frac{dq}{dp}[/tex]?

I think it is illogical. It would imply that at same time p is a function of q and q is a function of p. That seems nonsense to me. Am I allright?

Thanks for any answer.

- Thread starter Castilla
- Start date

- #1

- 240

- 0

[tex] \frac{dq}{dp}[/tex]?

I think it is illogical. It would imply that at same time p is a function of q and q is a function of p. That seems nonsense to me. Am I allright?

Thanks for any answer.

- #2

Hurkyl

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 14,916

- 19

There are several routes to happiness, but they all will give the same answer in the end (which is the reason such notation continues to be popular -- brevity is surprisingly important in mathematical notation).

One route to happiness is to have

- #3

- 240

- 0

derivatives, but tomorrow I will get it and I will post it here with all its context. Then I will ask you, Hurkyl, if said formula is aceptable on grounds of the explanation that you kindly have posted. (Excuse my english).

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 12K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 0

- Views
- 7K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 4K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 4K