Solving Difficult Integral: \int\frac{1}{1+x^7}dx

  • Thread starter cjc0117
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Integral
In summary, the conversation discusses how to evaluate a difficult integral and the use of power series and substitution methods. The conversation also mentions the concept of roots of unity and their role in factoring the denominator. The conversation ends with a suggestion to consider using the residues of the poles in the complex plane for the integral.
  • #1
cjc0117
94
1

Homework Statement



In my calc II book, there is an example that shows how to evaluate [itex]\int\frac{1}{1+x^7}dx[/itex] as a power series and then use the result to approximate [itex]\int^{\frac{1}{2}}_{0}\frac{1}{1+x^7}dx[/itex]. I understand how to do this. The book says in the margins that calculating [itex]\int\frac{1}{1+x^7}dx[/itex] by hand is extremely difficult, but it doesn't say it's impossible. Furthermore, wolframalpha gives the integral, but doesn't provide step-by-step results. Which brings me to my question: how can you solve this integral without using power series? Either the indefinite integral or the definite integral from 0 to 1/2.


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't really know where to begin. There don't seem to be any helpful substitutions. If I use integration by parts, I get [itex]\frac{x}{1+x^{7}}+7\int\frac{x^{7}}{(1+x^{7})^{2}}dx[/itex] which just seems much more complicated.

If I try to construct a right triangle with one leg equal to 1 and the other equal to [itex]x^{\frac{7}{2}}[/itex] and then use trig substitution with [itex]tanθ=x^{\frac{7}{2}}[/itex],[itex]sec^{2}θdθ=\frac{7}{2}x^{\frac{5}{2}}dx[/itex],[itex]sec^{2}θ=1+x^{7}[/itex], I can't find a way to rewrite [itex]x^{\frac{5}{2}}[/itex] ([itex]x^{\frac{5}{2}}=tan^{\frac{5}{7}}θ[/itex] ?) in terms of θ.

I noticed that -1 is a root of the denominator so I tried to factor out x+1 hoping that I could use a partial fraction decomposition, but I just end up with [itex]\int\frac{1}{(x+1)(x^{6}-x^{5}+x^{4}-x^{3}+x^{2}-x+1)}dx[/itex], which again, just seems to complicate it more.

I then tried to apply what very little I know about Leibniz Integration (differentiation under the integral sign) to try to solve the definite integral, but I had no luck. I thought of using [itex]F(t)=\int^{\frac{1}{2}}_{0}\frac{e^{-(1+x^{7})t}}{1+x^{7}}dx[/itex] as my function of t, but I just end up with [itex]F'(t)=-\int^{\frac{1}{2}}_{0}e^{-(1+x^{7})t}dx[/itex], which looks like a nonelementary integral.

Does anyone have any other ideas, either for the definite or indefinite integral? Could you point me in the right direction? Or at least just tell me that I'm in over my head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's basically a (potentially) horrid partial fraction decomposition followed by (potentially) equally horrid trig substitutions.

Factoring [itex]1+x^7[/itex] into a product of linear and quadratic terms is hard enough if you haven't seen the roots of unity tricks (there not that bad, but if you haven't seen it ...).

P.S. Partial fraction decomposition will handle all rational functions. Though the computations get really nasty in most general cases. As bad as they may have seemed, the problems you were given in your calculus class were actually very nice.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks for the input. I'll need more time to look into that method and then try to use a partial fraction decomposition. If anything, I just want to see how horrifying it gets.
 
  • #4
I don't want to discourage you from looking into it and learning a bit. But just to give you a head start on the true nastiness of the problem ...

[itex]x^7+1=(x+1)(x^2+\alpha_1x+1)(x^2+\alpha_2x+1)(x^2+\alpha_3x+1)[/itex] where [itex]\alpha_n=2\cos\frac{2\pi n}{7}[/itex].
 
  • #5
So here's what I've found so far about unity of roots:

To find the n roots of [itex]x^{n}=1[/itex], use the formula x=[itex]1(cos(\frac{2πk}{n})+isin(\frac{2πk}{n}))[/itex], where k=0 to n-1.

But how can I use this to factor the denominator to what you have? Does this only work for [itex]x^{n}=-1[/itex] when n is odd, as in our case? It seems to work for [itex]x^{7}=-1[/itex], x=[itex]-1(cos(\frac{2πk}{n})+isin(\frac{2πk}{n}))[/itex],k=0,1,2,3,4,5,6. Could you provide me with a good link to an article possibly because I'm having trouble finding one.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I don't have a good reference. For me it was more about knowing how the [itex]x^n=1[/itex] case works and why it works the way that it does. Then I can generalize to other cases as needed.

It really all boils down to Euler's formula, [itex]e^{i\theta}=\cos\theta+i\sin\theta[/itex], and the symmetries of complex roots of polynomials with real coefficients.

Whenever [itex]z=a+ib[/itex] is a complex root of a real polynomial, its complex conjugate [itex]\bar{z}=a-ib[/itex] is also a root of that polynomial. Then [itex]x-z[/itex] and [itex]x-\bar{z}[/itex] are complex factors of the polnomial. As an exercise, foil out [itex](x-z)(x-\bar{z})[/itex] and show that this is a quadratic with real coefficients.

This is basically how I got the quadratics that I gave previously.

Edit: Note that for [itex]z=e^{i\theta}[/itex], [itex]\bar{z}=e^{-i\theta}[/itex]. (Think about even/odd properties of cosine/sine)
 
  • #7
[itex](x-(a+bi))(x-(a-bi))=x^{2}-2ax+a^{2}+b^{2}[/itex]

So you're saying that one of the roots of [itex]1+x^{7}[/itex] is x=-1 and the other six make up three pairs of complex conjugates? Then [itex]1+x^{7}[/itex] can be factored into:

[itex]1+x^{7}=(x+1)(x-(a_{1}+b_{1}i))(x-(a_{1}-b_{1}i))(x-(a_{2}+b_{2}i))(x-(a_{2}-b_{2}i))(x-(a_{3}+b_{3}i))(x-(a_{3}-b_{3}i))[/itex]

[itex]1+x^{7}=(x+1)(x^{2}-2a_{1}x+a^{2}_{1}+b^{2}_{1})(x^{2}-2a_{2}x+a^{2}_{2}+b^{2}_{2})(x^{2}-2a_{3}x+a^{2}_{3}+b^{2}_{3})[/itex]

But how then do you know the values of [itex]a_{n}[/itex] and [itex]b_{n}[/itex]? I assume this is where the roots of unity tricks come into play. I tried using your factorization [itex]x^7+1=(x+1)(x^2+\alpha_1x+1)(x^2+\alpha_2x+1)(x^2+ \alpha_3x+1)[/itex] where [itex]\alpha_n=2\cos\frac{2\pi n}{7}[/itex] but the right side doesn't seem to equal the left.

EDIT: I think [itex]a^{2}_{n}+b^{2}_{n}[/itex] ends up being 1 since [itex]a_{n}=cos(\frac{2πn}{7})[/itex] and [itex]b_{n}=sin(\frac{2πn}{7})[/itex] and [itex]sin^{2}x+cos^{2}x=1[/itex], right? So then I can rewrite what I wrote as:

[itex]1+x^{7}=(x+1)(x^{2}-2a_{1}x+1)(x^{2}-2a_{2}x+1)(x^{2}-2a_{3}x+1)[/itex]

But are you sure that the formula for [itex]a_{n}[/itex] is correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Hi.

If you are interested in integral in (-inf, +inf) integral of complex function gives it. z^7+1=0 has seven solution z=e^iπ/7, e^iπ3/7, z=e^iπ5/7,-1,e^iπ9/7,e^iπ11/7,e^iπ13/7.
So you should think of three residues from three of these poles in upper or lower half of the complex plane and half of pole -1 for your integral.

Regards.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I'm going to need to learn complex analysis before I can do this.
 
  • #11
Hi. Using complex function
1/(1+z^7) = Σk Ak / (z - e^iπ(2k+1)/7)
Integrating this,
∫1/(1+z^7)dz = Σk Ak ln (z - e^iπ(2k+1)/7)
same as wolfram, isn't it. Regards.
 
Last edited:

What is an integral?

An integral is a mathematical concept that represents the area under a curve in a graph. It is used to find the total value of a quantity over a certain range.

Why is solving this integral difficult?

This integral is difficult because it involves a fraction with a polynomial in the denominator. This type of integral requires advanced techniques and strategies to solve.

What is the first step in solving this integral?

The first step in solving this integral is to try to simplify the integrand by factoring or using algebraic manipulation. This may help to make the integral more manageable.

What are some strategies for solving this integral?

Some strategies for solving this integral include using substitution, integration by parts, or partial fractions. These techniques can help to break down the integral into smaller, more manageable parts.

Are there any special cases to consider when solving this integral?

Yes, there are some special cases to consider when solving this integral. For example, if the power of x in the denominator is odd, it may be helpful to use trigonometric substitution. If the denominator is a binomial raised to an even power, it may be helpful to use the binomial expansion formula. It is important to carefully analyze the integral and choose the most appropriate strategy for solving it.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
333
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
691
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
728
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
863
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
748
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
754
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
746
Back
Top