1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Difficult Surface Integrals

  1. May 23, 2004 #1
    I expected Stokes theorem to make my life easier but these problems are even harder than the normal ones ive been doing.


    Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate [tex]\int\int_ScurlFdS[/tex]

    where F(x, y, z) = < x^2*y^3*z, sin(xyz) ,xyz >

    S: Part of cone [tex]y^2 = x^2 + z^2[/tex] that lies between the planes y = 0 and y = 3 oriented in the direction of the positive y - axis.

    not sure about this one... I parameterized the curve C as r(t) = < 3cost, 3, -3sint > to get a curve with positive orientation induced by S having normal vector in pos-y direction...a circle in plane y = 3,
    answer: 2187*pi/4

    Use Stokes' Theorem to evaluate [tex]\int\int_ScurlFdS[/tex]

    where [tex]F(x, y, z)=< e^{xy}*cos(z) ,x^2*z, xy >[/tex]

    S: Hemisphere [tex]x = sqrt{1-y^2-z^2}[/tex] oriented in the direction of the positive x - axis.

    curve C : r(t) = <0, cost, sint> ... a circle again in plane x=0, hmmm, wonder if I'm messing these up...?
    answer: 0 (this seemed way too easy...everything was zero!)
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2004
  2. jcsd
  3. May 23, 2004 #2

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    I assume you're talking about this verson of Stokes' theorem:
    [tex]\iint_{S}\nabla\times\vec{F}\cdot{d}\vec{S}=\oint_{C}\vec{F}\cdot{d}\vec{r}[/tex]

    In that case, your last calculation is correct; even if it is indecently easy.. :smile:
     
  4. May 23, 2004 #3
    Even for the first one? The answer just seemed completely off considering its size.
     
  5. May 23, 2004 #4

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    At a glance, the first one ought to be zero as well..
     
  6. May 23, 2004 #5

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Sorry, first glance wrong..
     
    Last edited: May 23, 2004
  7. May 23, 2004 #6

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    If 3^{7}=2187, then the first should be correct as well.
     
  8. May 23, 2004 #7
    thank you :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Difficult Surface Integrals
  1. Difficult integral (Replies: 7)

  2. Difficult integral (Replies: 19)

  3. Difficult integral (Replies: 3)

  4. Difficult integral (Replies: 26)

  5. Difficult integrals? (Replies: 3)

Loading...