1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Difficulty 5 e/m problem

  1. Jul 21, 2004 #1
    Thank you for viewing this problem, hope u can help me.

    In one type of computer keyboard, each key holds a small metal plate that serves as one plate of a parallel-plate, air-filled capacitor. When the key is depressed, the plate separation decreases and the capacitance increases. Electronic circuitry detects the change in capacitance and thus detects that the key has been pressed. In one particular keyboard, the area of each metal plate is A , and the separation between the plates is "s" before the key is depressed.

    If the circuitry can detect a change in capacitance of DeltaC, how far must the key be depressed before the circuitry detects its depression? Use epsilon_0 for the permittivity of free space.

    I've tried (epsilon_0*A)/DeltaC but the correct answer involves variable "s"
    I've also tried (epsilon_0*A)/(s-Deltas) but the correct answer does not depend on the variable: Deltas
    I've ran out of idea.. please ill take any feedback =/

    Thanks again for your time and concern
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 23, 2004 #2

    The parallel plate capacitor relationship is

    C = \frac{\epsilon_{0}A}{s}

    where A is the crosssectional area and s is the distance between the plates (here of course, we neglect fringing).

    When you press a key you decrease s and therefore increase the capacitance, as you correctly mentioned. Supposing the key is depressed a certain distance 'x' so that the new capacitance [tex]C_{new}[/tex] is given by

    C_{new} = \frac{\epsilon_{0}A}{s-x}

    The DeltaC is the difference between [tex]C_{new}[/tex] and [tex]C[/tex], as I understand from your problem. Please clarify all this first...

    Also could you consider C as a general function so that

    dC = \frac{\partial C}{\partial x}dx

    I wonder if we could use this approach somehow...
  4. Jul 23, 2004 #3

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    please don't double post

    It looks like imationrouter03 posted this same problem twice! :mad: (That's a PF no-no.)

    In any case, let's continue this here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=264196
  5. Jul 23, 2004 #4
    srry for posting this twice, it was my mistake for posting it on the general physics forum.. since it involved hw help.. but w.e it doesn't matter now.. i appreciate ur help.. it won't happen again.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Difficulty 5 e/m problem
  1. Crazy e/m problem (Replies: 8)

  2. E/m resistance problem (Replies: 3)

  3. E&m problems (Replies: 3)

  4. E&M Homework Problem (Replies: 8)