Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Diffraction derivation on Wiki - wrong?

  1. Jun 12, 2005 #1
    Hey Everyone, anybody want to verify if what I believe is true- Wikipedia has an incorrect derivation for Fraunhoffer diffraction to calculate the intensity from a single slit.
    The step I believe they "fudged" is the final integral under "Quantitative analysis of single-slit diffraction". The integral is from -a/2 to a/2 when they find it equal to (e^ikax/2z - e^-ikax/2z ) / (2ikax/2z). I believe this is the correct answer for this type of diffraction, but if I remember my integrals I can't see how they get the 'a' term in the denominator. Take a look, let me know what you think, if it really is wrong and somebody can correct the Wiki page, would they do so? (just click edit on the section) Or if we discuss it here and find it is in error, I'll correct it later.
    Thanks! jet
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 12, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    That C is arbitary and can be redefined as to factor "1/a"...

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Diffraction derivation on Wiki - wrong?
  1. Electron Diffraction (Replies: 5)

  2. Diffraction Grating (Replies: 2)

  3. Fraunhofer diffraction (Replies: 6)

  4. Diffraction Gratings (Replies: 4)