Diffraction derivation on Wiki - wrong?

  • Thread starter jetpeach
  • Start date
5
0
Hey Everyone, anybody want to verify if what I believe is true- Wikipedia has an incorrect derivation for Fraunhoffer diffraction to calculate the intensity from a single slit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
The step I believe they "fudged" is the final integral under "Quantitative analysis of single-slit diffraction". The integral is from -a/2 to a/2 when they find it equal to (e^ikax/2z - e^-ikax/2z ) / (2ikax/2z). I believe this is the correct answer for this type of diffraction, but if I remember my integrals I can't see how they get the 'a' term in the denominator. Take a look, let me know what you think, if it really is wrong and somebody can correct the Wiki page, would they do so? (just click edit on the section) Or if we discuss it here and find it is in error, I'll correct it later.
Thanks! jet
 

dextercioby

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
12,950
532
That C is arbitary and can be redefined as to factor "1/a"...

Daniel.
 

Related Threads for: Diffraction derivation on Wiki - wrong?

  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
530

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top