Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Digital Electronics Boolean Reduction ! Help Please

  1. Dec 12, 2004 #1
    Digital Electronics Boolean Reduction!!!!!!!!!!! Help Please

    Ok i need to figure out how to reduce this ive been working on it for 2 days straight and cant figure it out...please help...its due tommorow :uhh: :cry:




    [tex](ab)[/tex][tex]([/tex][tex]\overline c + \overline d[/tex][tex])[/tex][tex]+[/tex][tex](a+b)[/tex][tex]([/tex][tex]\overline c \overline d)[/tex]
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 12, 2004 #2
    well good question. I expanded that equation and then threw it in a k-map. I got the exact expanded equation back. I would say that that equation is the simplest form. Hopefully someone can back me up. my kmap was sum of m(4,8,12,13,14).
     
  4. Dec 12, 2004 #3
    it cant be the same equation because i was given it for homework like that and have to do a whole project on simplifying it. I need to make the circuit using the least amount of logic gates.

    Heres the question i was given in class:

    Design a traffic light circuit using the following criteria

    1. The light will be green when both lanes A and B are occupied but C and D are not both occupied.
    2. The light will be green when either A or B is occupied while C and D are both vacant.

    So the formula i have at the beginning of the post is what i created after reading the criteria.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2004
  5. Dec 16, 2004 #4
    So what was the answer?

    I actually wrote a Visual Basic program to simulate your logic in your opening post and it does work as you say. However, I couldn't figure out how to reduce it either.

    So now I'm curious what the reduction logic is, and how was it arrived at?

    I tried using DeMogan's laws, and various other logic rules but I couldn't reduce it either. Somehow though I have a gut feeling that it can be reduced. So now you have me curious. :confused:
     
  6. Dec 16, 2004 #5

    dduardo

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus

    I get the same equation back
     
  7. Dec 16, 2004 #6
    If you created this formula what make you so sure that it can be reduced?

    I went over your criteria and came up with the exact same formula. Unusually if there's a way to reduce it I'll notice it at that stage of development. I really can't see any obvious way to reduce it.

    I even went to a logic circuit simulator on the web and typed in the logic circuit (see attached figure).

    I thought that maybe I could see a way to reduce it by just looking at the circuit but I can't see anything there either.

    The NOT gates in my circuit were used simply because the simulator would only provide NAND and NOR gates. So they aren't really a part of the main logic. Also the dual outputs represent the central OR in your formula. I just didn't feel like bothering to put in the additional NOR gate with yet another inverter so I left the two outputs hanging. The circuit works as you describe, but again I can't see any obvious way to reduce it.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Dec 16, 2004 #7

    dduardo

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus

    If you use a 8to1 MUX with ABC as the select lines and D as the input then you only need one inverter.
     
  9. Dec 16, 2004 #8
    Reducing gates or chips?

    Actually I wasn't even thinking in terms of using anything like a multiplexer. I was thinking just in terms of reducing primitive gates. Heck, you can always reduce anything to a single chip if you're willing to use an FPGA or CPLD. :biggrin:

    So I wasn't thinking in terms of reducing chips. I was thinking in terms of reducing gates. This is particularly important if you're actually going to be programming FPGAs or CPLDs.
     
  10. Dec 28, 2004 #9
    Recheck your assumptions.

    This is intriguing. Like with the others, a K-Map shows that this is in minimal form as it has been stated to us. The question, however is, "is there anything else? Has anything else been left out? In particular, are there any additional 'Don't care' conditions? These can be important if there are any."

    [ BTW: I'm sorry that I've been away from the forum for so long, however I ran into problems switching from a dial-up access to DSL. It was just one problem after another; including even an apparent mother board failure. ]

    KM
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Digital Electronics Boolean Reduction ! Help Please
  1. Boolean reduction (Replies: 2)

  2. Digital Electronics (Replies: 6)

Loading...