Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dimension of a partial decay width

  1. Dec 23, 2015 #1
    Hi all,

    I know that the dimension of a partial decay width or a cross section should be GeV or pb respectively. But what if i have a decay width probational to

    ## \Gamma = 10^{-3} GeV^3 G_\mu ##

    where I calculated all the masses and constants in ## \Gamma ##, ## G_\mu ## is the Fermi coupling constant equals ## 10^{-5} GeV^{-2} ##, then

    ## \Gamma = 10^{-8} GeV ##, not GeV, so should I multiply ## \Gamma ## by 10^8 to have the right dimension ?

    Regards,
    S.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 23, 2015 #2

    ChrisVer

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I am confused... you wrote Γ in GeV, and then you say "not GeV"...
    why would you multiply it with 10^8 to get the right dimensions? the right dimension for what?
     
  4. Dec 23, 2015 #3
    Well, the problem that i calculate this decay width, namely:

    Gamma(Sbb) = ((Ybb^2 * mS )/(128* Pi)) * beta^3,

    where S is a coloured scalar, mS ~ 700 GeV , it's coupling to b b~ of order 10^-2, and beta =Sqrt[1-4mb^2/mS^2].

    This formula is similar to Eq. 2.6 in ( http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0503172v2.pdf ), but i adjusted the colour factors for the coloured scalars and used 1/v^2= G, mf^2/v^2 ~ Ybb^2.

    I think now the dimension is aright => GeV, but while calculating this width by Mathematica gives ~ 10^-3 GeV, Matrix element calculators as Madgraph and Calchep gives it ~ 10^3 GeV !!, so what is missed in the analytic expression (some factor of 10^6) to make this discrepancy ..

    Bests,
    S.
     
  5. Dec 24, 2015 #4

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    The dimensions are right (GeV), just the numerical value disagrees.
    106 could indicate some factor of 1000 applied in the wrong way, but it's hard to tell if you don't show all input values and results.
     
  6. Jan 3, 2016 #5
    You should get something the same as the Higgs.

    Your scalar mass is like 4 times larger, and a 10^-2 coupling for the yukawa is half that of the b roughly. Therefore your answer should be similar to the partial width of that of b quarks. Which is order 10^-3 GeV. So the calchep calculation has been done incorrectly, or its not in GeV
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Dimension of a partial decay width
  1. Partial width (Replies: 3)

  2. Decay width (Replies: 1)

  3. Decay Width (Replies: 1)

Loading...