1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Dimensional analysis dilemma

  1. Mar 3, 2017 #1
    Hi, this problem is bugging me for several days now. In ”200 Puzzling Physics Problems”, Gnadik, Honyek, Riley there is this Problem 59:
    The solution to this is an ingenious resort to dimensional analysis, as follows:
    Now, I don't have a problem with this. I wonder however, what if we express, instead of the power needed to hover, the rotor speed, or frequency, that has the dimension s-1.
    this would lead to α=1/2, β=-1/2 and γ=-δ=k. So, we'll get for the rotor speed s, needed for the helicopter to hoover:
    http://www.educatiarutiera.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/sol591.png [Broken]
    Please let me know wether my reasoning is correct. I'm not familiar with dimensional analysis and I'd really want to introduce this problem to some of my students. Thank you.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 3, 2017 #2

    Andy Resnick

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Awesome problem! But I think the motor power is proportional to the output torque * rotation frequency, not simply the rotation frequency. If I did the problem correctly, if the output torque is held constant, the rotor frequency of the smaller helicopter is faster by 2^(7/2). That said, it's early and the caffeine hasn't kicked in.... but at least it agrees with observation: small birds and insects move their wings much faster than larger birds.
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
  4. Mar 3, 2017 #3
    Thanks for reply but oops, I just found about something called ”Buckingham π theorem” - details - that is apparently disregarded by Gnadik's formula. I intend to study more but I could really make use of somebody more experienced's insight.
  5. Mar 3, 2017 #4
    Later edit: sorry, my formula above is wrong, please consider this instead:
    http://www.educatiarutiera.ro/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/sol592.png [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 8, 2017
  6. Mar 3, 2017 #5


    Staff: Mentor

    Thanks for sharing that. I never heard of Buckingham π theorem before. It is most interesting and clever.
  7. Mar 3, 2017 #6
    The Buckingham Pi Theorem is well known in dimensional analysis. I encountered it in graduate school 50 years ago. A bit of Internet research will no doubt turn up more info on it.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted