Dimension Check of Einstein's Field Equations

In summary, the conversation discusses the difficulty in performing a dimensional check of Einstein's field equations due to the use of different units in various books. The speaker believes they have found the dimensions for the diagonal terms in the Ricci tensor, which are all inverse length squared. However, there is a discrepancy with the Robertson Walker metric tensor's diagonal elements, which should be dimensionless but have squared length units. The use of different coordinate systems also affects the units of the metric tensor components.
  • #1
bentmol
1
0
This is my first post in Physics Forums.

I am trying to a dimensional check of Einstein's field equations. Unfortunately, most books consider c = 1 or sometimes even G = c = 1, when presenting the field equations. This makes it very difficult to do a dimensional check.

In spite of this, I think that I have found the dimensions of the diagonal terms in the Ricci tensor. They all seem to be inverse length squared. The terms in the Ricci scalar too seem to have the same dimensions, inverse length squared.

This means that the Robertson Walker metric tensor's diagonal elements should be dimensionless. But the last 2 diagonal terms in the metric tensor are a^2*r^2 and a^2*r^2*sin^2(theta). Clearly, they have the dimension squared length, whereas the first diagonal term -1 has no units and the second diagonal term a^2/(1-k*r^2) too has no units. (a is dimensionless, k has the dimension inverse length squared and r has the dimensions of length).

Thanks in advance.

Sundar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The units of the metric tensor components ( and hence the Ricci tensor components) depend on the coordinate system. In the relation:
[tex]ds^2 = g_{\mu \nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu [/tex]

ds^2 has units of length squared. In a Cartesian coordinate system, dx^2 has units of length squared, so the metric tensor components are dimensionless. However, in spherical coordinates, dr^2 has units of length squared, so grr is dimensionless, but dθ^2 is dimensionless so gθθ has units of length squared.
 

1. What is the purpose of conducting a dimension check on Einstein's Field Equations?

A dimension check is used to verify the consistency and validity of the equations in terms of units and dimensions. This is important in science as it ensures that the equations being used accurately describe the physical phenomena being studied.

2. How is a dimension check performed on Einstein's Field Equations?

To perform a dimension check, each term in the equations is assigned a dimension (such as length, time, or mass) and then compared to other terms in the equation. If the dimensions on both sides of the equation are equal, it is considered consistent and valid.

3. What are the consequences of an incorrect dimension check on Einstein's Field Equations?

An incorrect dimension check could indicate a mistake in the derivation or application of the equations. This could lead to inaccurate predictions or understanding of the physical phenomena being studied, and could potentially hinder progress in related research.

4. Can Einstein's Field Equations be used in any dimension or are they limited to a specific dimension?

Einstein's Field Equations can be used in any dimension, as long as the dimensions of each term in the equations are consistent. This is because the equations were derived based on general principles of relativity and are not limited to a specific dimension.

5. How does a successful dimension check contribute to our understanding of the universe?

A successful dimension check provides confidence in the accuracy of Einstein's Field Equations, which are fundamental in our understanding of the universe. It allows us to make precise predictions about the behavior of matter and energy in the universe, and has been confirmed by numerous experiments and observations.

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
433
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top