• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Dimentionally consistent

  • Thread starter tony873004
  • Start date

tony873004

Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,749
141
Is this expression dimentionally consistant?
[tex]v^2=2ax[/tex]

where v is velocity, a is acceleration and x represents a length in meters.
[tex](m/s)^2=2*m/s^2 * m[/tex]
[tex]m^2/s^2=2*m/s^2 * m[/tex]
[tex]m^2/s^2 = 2 * m^2/s^2[/tex]

I'm not sure if the 2 makes the thing not dimentionally consistant. My guess is since the 2 is unitless, the expression is dimentionally consistant. Any thoughts?
 
m^2/s^2 = 2m^2/s^2 is correct both dimensionwise and unit-wise
Yes, 2 is dimensionless in this equation. The reason why we 1=2 is because this equation is very specific. By doing this we assume acceleration is constant and that the initial velocity is zero. In fact we we multiply both sides by the mass we have

mv^2 = 2max

F = ma

mv^2 = 2fx

if we assume the force is constant and in the direction of motion we can say
w = fx

im sure you see this now

mv^2/2 = w
KE = w, so the above equation that we started with is actually a derivation from the work energy theorem. And it basically states that work is the change in kinetic energy. more or less velocity squared is directly proportional to the product of acceleration and displacement. So now that the issue of the 2 has been addressed I just want to clear up something else

ft/s^2 is dimensionally correct with m/s^2 as the dimension are both L/T^2
however the equation is not correct by units, in order to make a dimensionally correct equation that has terms with different units into an equation that is correct in both senses, all we need to do is simply multiply by a conversion factor. If you take an advanced dynamics course your EOM's will often have several ugly terms and it is always a good idea to make sure all the terms have the same dimensions. This way if you know the dimensions on a term aren't correct, then you should just accept the fact that the equation in incorrect and there is a mistake in the previous steps, always a good time saver before finalizing any work!
 
538
2
2 dimensionally constant and has no dimensions , can be taken as [itex]M^0L^0T^0[/itex]
 

Related Threads for: Dimentionally consistent

  • Posted
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
979
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
918
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
967
Replies
1
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top