1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Dirac-Delta Function Property

  1. Nov 7, 2013 #1
    I'm not sure how they got the RHS of equation 349:

    where did the |y'(xj)| in the denominator come from?

    According to (343) the RHS is only f(x0) which in this case is the jth term of the sum that gives y(xj) = 0..

    pqayw.png
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 7, 2013 #2

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    ... um... from evaluating the integral?

    I don't think that is what (343) says.

    The integral you are evaluating is centered in a small range about ##y_j=y(x_j)##.
    (343) is for the entire y axis, and is centered about the origin.
     
  4. Nov 10, 2013 #3
    I'm sorry I still don't quite understand how the |y'(xj)| in the denominator came about. How do you evaluate the integral?
     
  5. Nov 10, 2013 #4
    It comes from the Jacobian due to a change of variables done in order to perform the integral
     
  6. Nov 10, 2013 #5
    I still don't quite understand why is there a denominator:

    δ(y(x)) is zero everywhere except at the particular xj where δ(y(x)) = δ(y(xj)) = δ(0) = 1

    Then the integral can be simplified to give:

    ∫ f(x) dx from xj-ε to xj+ε where ε is small enough such that it does not coincide with other solutions of y(xi) = 0 for some xi.

    Then that should give f(xj)∫ dx from xj-ε to xj

    = f(xj) * 1 (∫ dx from xj-ε to xj+ε = 1)
    = f(xj)


    where did the |f'(xj)| in the denominator come from?
     
  7. Nov 10, 2013 #6

    Simon Bridge

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Isn't it zero everywhere except where ##y=y_j:y_j=y(x_j)##
    (What is y(x)?)

    That means the ##\delta(y)## in the integrand turns into ##\delta(y-y_j)## to stay consistent.
    Maths is a language - what is the math here supposed to be describing?

    Now you can apply the rule.

    Also take note: for a pure math interpretation...
    ... how did they change variables?
     
  8. Nov 11, 2013 #7
    That's all wrong. δ(0) isn't equal to unit. The integral is equal to unit. δ(0) itself is an undefined divergent quantity - infinite.
     
  9. Nov 11, 2013 #8
    They changed from an integral over dx to an integral over dy. There is a Jacobean factor.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Dirac-Delta Function Property
  1. Dirac Delta function (Replies: 17)

  2. Dirac Delta Function (Replies: 4)

Loading...