Hi everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

From the condition:

[tex] \gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{\nu}+\gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu} = 2g_{\mu\nu} [/tex]

how does one formally proceed to show that the objects [tex]\gamma_{\mu}[/tex] must be 4x4 matrices? I unfortunately know very little about Clifford algebras, and for this special relativity project of mine I'd much rather not need brute force!

Cheerio!

Kane

PS: I'm using the signature (+---) for the metric tensor, although this should only change the content of the matrices, not the proof itself, I suspect.

PPS: I quite realise that it probably cannot be shown that the gamma matrices *must* be 4x4 matrices, what I want to know is if the anticommutator conditions are precisely the defining relations for a R(1,3) Clifford algebra or something like that, and how we eliminate the possibility of lower-dimensional 'isomorphisms' (don't know the correct algebra mapping term) existing.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dirac Gamma Matrices

Loading...

Similar Threads for Dirac Gamma Matrices |
---|

I Two particles Dirac type equation question |

I Dirac equation, one question |

I Spin Angular Momentum Dirac Equation |

I Is the Dirac free equation actually free |

I Simplify the Dirac Energy Equation? |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**