How to prove an inequality with a direct proof?

In summary, the conversation discusses how to prove the inequality {a}^{n} - {b}^{n} \le {na}^{n-1}(a-b), where a and b are real numbers and n is a positive integer. The conversation suggests using a direct proof and provides a hint to factorise the expression and estimate the size of one of the factors.
  • #1
Moodion
2
0
Hello, I'm having trouble with an assigned problem, not really sure where to begin with it:

Prove that if \(\displaystyle a \in R\) and \(\displaystyle b \in R\) such that \(\displaystyle 0 < b < a\), then \(\displaystyle {a}^{n} - {b}^{n} \le {na}^{n-1}(a-b)\), where n is a positive integer, using a direct proof.

Pointers or the whole proof would be appreciated (might require some explanation afterwards!)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Moodion said:
Hello, I'm having trouble with an assigned problem, not really sure where to begin with it:

Prove that if \(\displaystyle a \in R\) and \(\displaystyle b \in R\) such that \(\displaystyle 0 < b < a\), then \(\displaystyle {a}^{n} - {b}^{n} \le {na}^{n-1}(a-b)\), where n is a positive integer, using a direct proof.

Pointers or the whole proof would be appreciated (might require some explanation afterwards!)

Thanks
Hi Moodion and welcome to MHB!

Try factorising $a^n-b^n$ as $(a-b)(a^{n-1} + \ldots + b^{n-1})$ and then estimate the size of the second factor.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the hint, just what I needed
 

1. What is direct proof of an inequality?

Direct proof of an inequality is a mathematical method used to show that one quantity is larger or smaller than another. It involves using logical steps and mathematical properties to demonstrate that the inequality is true.

2. How is direct proof different from indirect proof?

Direct proof involves showing that an inequality is true by directly manipulating the given quantities, while indirect proof involves assuming the opposite of what needs to be proven and showing that it leads to a contradiction.

3. What are the key steps in a direct proof of an inequality?

The key steps in a direct proof of an inequality are: stating the given quantities, stating what needs to be proven, using mathematical properties and logic to manipulate the quantities, and arriving at a conclusion that proves the inequality.

4. Can direct proof be used for all types of inequalities?

Yes, direct proof can be used for all types of inequalities, including simple inequalities with numbers, as well as more complex inequalities with variables and expressions.

5. How can direct proof be applied in real-world situations?

Direct proof can be applied in real-world situations to compare quantities and show that one is larger or smaller than the other. This can be useful in various fields such as economics, physics, and engineering.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
35
Views
544
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
795
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
760
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
384
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
521
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top