What's the difference (if any) between a direct sum and a direct product of rings?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For example, in Ireland and Rosen's number theory text, they mention that, in the context of rings, the Chinese Remainder Theorem implies that [tex]\mathbb{Z}/(m_1 \cdots m_n)\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}/m_1\mathbb{Z}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathbb{Z}/m_n\mathbb{Z}[/tex]. The way I've been taught is that every [tex]\oplus[/tex] should be replaced with a [tex]\times[/tex] so that we are talking about direct products, not direct sums.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Direct Sum of Rings?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Direct Rings | Date |
---|---|

I Entries in a direction cosine matrix as derivatives | Feb 20, 2017 |

I Prove that V is the internal direct sum of two subspaces | Feb 6, 2017 |

Direct Products of Modules - Bland - Rings and Their Modules | May 2, 2014 |

Direct Sum of Rings | Apr 14, 2010 |

Ideals of direct product of rings are direct product of respective ideals? | Sep 27, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**