I'm not sure if this post should go here or in the Calc setion, but I figure more knowledgable people browse this form. This question is relating to 'directionality' of doing closed loop integrals.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If you have some 2D wire structure, lets image it looks like a square wave, or a square well. Ok, square well, so we have a U shape, lets say with 4 points, ABCD where BC is the bottom of the well. Now if I were to sum the segments in the Y direction I would have AB + CD, and we can see that AB = DC = -CD

So we have AB - AB = 0.

Now rather then summing in the Y direction, were summing along a path. We define this path by the normals or tangentials (curl or div theorem respectively) of the segments. Since the N(ormal)ab = Ndc = -Ncd we have shown this works with the previous addition.

Now increase the rank so its summing surfaces to get a volume. Does the stoke's theorem incorporate a direction such that opposite sides of this cube-well now, when added together in say the Z direction are 0, but are , for the stokes, not added in directions but added with their normals taken into account? So like 2 opposite ends of the well would add rather than cancel?

I hope Im being clear. Its a difficult problem to visualize.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Directionality in Stokes Theorem for Volumes

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Directionality in Stokes Theorem for Volumes

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**