Dirichlet series

  • #1
Let be the series in the form [tex] g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n } |\Lambda (n) |^{2} n^{-s} [/tex] where lambda is Von Mangoldt function, my question is how could i get an exact or at least almost exact expresion for g(s) . My other question is how could i obtainthe Mellin transform of the function [tex] \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n+1) [/tex] i have tried sum by parts but got no results.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
of course i tried (wrong ??) with the property, given a Dirchlet series [tex] g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} f(n)n^{-s} [/tex] then [tex] -g'(s)/g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} f(n) \Lambda (n) n^{-s} [/tex] but i think this does not work unless f(n) is multiplicative, however could it be used at least as a good approximation or modifying it a bit coul work??
 
Last edited:
  • #3
matt grime
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
9,395
3
Welcome back, Jose.
 
  • #4
readng Tom Apostol's 'Introduction to Analytic number theory' the desired series is just [tex] AT^{-1} \int_{-T}^{T}dt | \frac{ \zeta ' (a+it)}{\zeta (a+it)} |^{2} = \sum_{1 \le n} | \Lambda (n) |^{2} n^{2a} [/tex] , with a>1 and T tending to infinity. but i don't know the value of the integral, could someone provide an approximate value of the integral over t (-T,T) above ??, thank you.
 
  • #5
453
0
How many accounts has this guy made on here?
 
  • #6
I have also tried using partial summation so:

[tex] \sum_{n \le x } \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n) = B(x)= \Lambda (x+2) \Psi (x) - \sum_{n \le x } \Psi (x) ( \Lambda (x+2) - \Lambda (x+1) ) [/tex]

so [tex] g(s)= \sum_{1 \le n} \Lambda (n+2) \Lambda (n) n^{-s}= s \int_{1}^{\infty}B(x) x^{- (s+1)} [/tex]

to obtain 'g(s)' any hint please?? thanx.
 

Related Threads on Dirichlet series

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top