Disappointing Debunking on this forum.

  • Thread starter KokomoJ0
  • Start date
4
0
I came to this forum with the idea that there would be intelligent discussion on such subjects as 911 and other areas of concern. I am very disappointed to discover that a few people have determined that they are the final word and have closed all further discussion when fraud battles against nist fema asce government etc rage on in the courts regarding these very issues.

Its nice to see these issues have been settled to satisfaction by whomever the person(s) is/are that shut down any further discussion of the subject.
 

russ_watters

Mentor
18,866
5,050
It's a tough compromise. We want to be able to debunk things but also don't want to allow promotion of crackpottery. And there are certain subjects (like 9/11) that bring the crackpots out of the woodwork, so we don't discuss them. Typically the subjects we have banned (like the 9/11 conspiracy theories) have clear right and wrong answers anyway and there isn't much to be gained by discussing them.
 
987
54
Daily Kos banned 9/11 conspiracy discussions as well.
 
4
0
It's a tough compromise. We want to be able to debunk things but also don't want to allow promotion of crackpottery. And there are certain subjects (like 9/11) that bring the crackpots out of the woodwork, so we don't discuss them. Typically the subjects we have banned (like the 9/11 conspiracy theories) have clear right and wrong answers anyway and there isn't much to be gained by discussing them.
Crackpots frustrate me too.

Considering there are continuing developments on the subject and also taking into consideration the monumental implications should a conspiracy be proven I am sure you are right on target that there is nothing to be gained by talking about it.

I noticed the last moderator post that who ever shut the thread down agreed with the official report yet architectural engineers and scientists are suing the government for false information dissemination.

In any case I am happy that the moderators/administrators on this forum have determined there is a "clear right and wrong" on the subject and that the "right" answer is the official story stands.

As I stated earlier I find your approach disappointing and certainly counterproductive to resolving any rendition of truth.
 

mgb_phys

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
7,744
11
I think discussion on individual reports or technical questions about steel structures and fire proofing are allowed.
The trouble is that any difference between one engineering opinion and any official report immediately becomes "it's all a cover up".

It's a bit like the argument that goes; Chaos says that science can't answer everything, therefore science is wrong, therefore anything that science says is wrong must be right, therefore crystal healing is true!
 
Last edited:

Evo

Mentor
22,867
2,343
The "truth" as you call it has been resolved and there is no credible new information. There are still crackpots trying to make a buck off of the gullible, there always will be.

There are many crackpot sites on the internet where you can discuss 9/11 conspiracy theories, this is not one of them.
 
Last edited:

Ivan Seeking

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,093
174
As stated in the S&D posting guidelines, my PM box is always open to new information about closed subjects.

In over four years we have only closed ten subjects. Some people probably think that makes me a crackpot, and others think it makes me a dictator. As long as I am hated equally by both sides then I must be doing something right. :biggrin:
 
4
0
As stated in the S&D posting guidelines, my PM box is always open to new information about closed subjects.

In over four years we have only closed ten subjects. Some people probably think that makes me a crackpot, and others think it makes me a dictator. As long as I am hated equally by both sides then I must be doing something right. :biggrin:
Frankly this would be a waste of my time. I just finished reading all that I need to read to fully understand the governance of this forum.

I have found very little intelligent discourse here on the subject but rather hyperbole, obfuscation, double think and a host of other out right errors from people some who are self proclaimed structural engineers.

Frankly I have reconsidered and this is not a site where I wish to engage anyone on the matter.

I will go back to my other crack pot site where actual "physics" is discussed and you can continue your censorship here.
 
4
0
feel free to delete my account as I have visted the account settings and did not see a close account procedure.
 

cristo

Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,056
72
I find it rather strange that one would create an account solely to complain and then say that they will not be posting here. Well, it is apparent that this site is not for you. I would, however, like to add that the many members and regular posters to this forum are quite happy with the way that it is run, and with the fact that it is one of the only physics forums on the internet that actually tries to educate about physics and not crackpot physics or conspiracy theories.
 

Related Threads for: Disappointing Debunking on this forum.

  • Posted
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Posted
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Posted
2 3
Replies
51
Views
9K
  • Posted
Replies
13
Views
642
  • Posted
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • Posted
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving

Hot Threads

Top