What was, in effect, the main dispute between Dawkins and Gould?
As I understand it, the main disputes were:
* whether punctuated equilibrium (Gould's idea) is fundamentally different from gradualism, or not.
* whether mainstream evolutionists such as Dawkins were paying too little attention to non-adaptive evolutionary processes (Gould's "spandrels", also called exaptations), or not.
There were probably other points of disagreement, too.
Separate names with a comma.