- #1

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter hubble_bubble
- Start date

- #1

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

- #2

Muphrid

- 834

- 2

What you wrote is the equivalent of distance = time x speed^2. That doesn't make sense.

- #3

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

Sorry the time is in Planck time not seconds. My mistake.

- #4

Muphrid

- 834

- 2

- #5

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

Well it does work. The units all balance.

- #6

Muphrid

- 834

- 2

By all means, if the units do balance, then I am here to learn. Show me.

- #7

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

Sorry I messed up.

It should be dc^3 = tc^2.

That's where I needed the cubed value.

It should be dc^3 = tc^2.

That's where I needed the cubed value.

- #8

Muphrid

- 834

- 2

Distance x (distance^3)/(time^3) is not equal to (time)x(distance^2)/(time^2), right?

- #9

hubble_bubble

- 135

- 0

Sorry scrub that I have mixed up two sets of equations. It is 12.53 AM here.

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 929

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 291

- Replies
- 64

- Views
- 733

- Replies
- 24

- Views
- 753

- Replies
- 7

- Views
- 659

- Last Post

- Replies
- 26

- Views
- 954

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 798

- Replies
- 83

- Views
- 3K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 629

- Last Post

- Replies
- 27

- Views
- 677