Distinctions Between Logical Invalidity and Falsity

  • #1
18,823
8,996
Validity and truth do not have to go hand-in-hand and here's why...

http://physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=177 [Broken]
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
43,021
970
Though I notice that the author starts out by saying
One common misconception among people is that an argument is immediately false if determined invalid (and vice versa).
but immediately switches to
There is distinction between the validity of a conclusion and whether the conclusion is true or not.

confusing the "argument" with the "conclusion".
 
  • #3
jcsd
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,101
12
yes, I have to say I agree with Hall's of Ivy, the article has told us nothing that wasn't known and fails to seperate the argument from the conclusion (which is a common reson for the fallacy that because an argument is invalid the conclusion is false)
 
  • #4
Jeebus
255
0
Yeah then he goes on saying,

"In conclusion, arguments can be true and invalid simultaneously. At the same time, they can be false and valid as well. Validity and truth concerning arguments are not dependent on one another so care should be made as to determining the truth of an argument based on the validity."

He jumped all over the place.
 

Suggested for: Distinctions Between Logical Invalidity and Falsity

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
174
Replies
3
Views
221
Replies
6
Views
362
Replies
12
Views
633
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
226
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
210
Replies
9
Views
444
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
364
Replies
7
Views
990
Top