Divergence theorem again

  • Thread starter Tony11235
  • Start date
  • #1
Tony11235
255
0
Suppose [tex] D \subset \Re^3 [/tex] is a bounded, smooth domain with boundary [tex] \partial D [/tex] having outer unit normal [tex] n = (n_1, n_2, n_3) [/tex]. Suppose [tex] f: \Re^3 \rightarrow \Re [/tex] is a given smooth function. Use the divergence theorem to prove that

[tex] \int_{D} f_{y}(x, y, z)dxdydz = \int_{\partial D} f(x, y, z)n_2(x, y, z)dS[/tex]

I think I see how they might be equal but I don't know where to start as far as proving it.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
10,089
135
Hint:
Consider the vector function:
[tex]F(x,y,z)=(0,f(x,y,z),0)[/tex]
 
  • #3
Tony11235
255
0
While we're on it, I have another similar question. Say F:R^3 -> R^3 is a C^1 function, verifty that

[tex]\int_{\partial D} \nabla \times F \cdot n dS = 0 [/tex]

in two ways, first using Stokes theorem, then using the Divergence theorem.

By the way, I'm currently in vector calculus and at the same time first semester PDE. We don't cover the divergence theorem and such until way later into the semester. But our PDE book requires that you have some minor knowlegde of these theorems. And that's what our professor is having us do right now, especially for those of us that are currently in vector calculus.
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Divergence theorem again

  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
195
Replies
2
Views
286
Replies
9
Views
456
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
527
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
687
Replies
3
Views
384
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
409
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
450
Replies
11
Views
433
Top