Division using index notation

  • Thread starter sinad
  • Start date
  • #1
2
0
Hello everyone,

Recently I started to use index notation, but still the division is not clear for me. I'll mention just some simple examples that I'm not sure about:

Does [itex]a =\frac{1}{b_i}[/itex] mean that [itex]a = \sum_{i=1}^{3}\frac{1}{b_i}[/itex] or [itex]a = 1 / \sum_{i = 1}^{3}b_i[/itex] ?

Similarly, does [itex]a_i =\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}}[/itex] mean that [itex]a_i = \sum_{j=1}^{3}\frac{b_i}{c_{jj}}[/itex] or [itex]a = b_i / \sum_{j = 1}^{3}c_{jj}[/itex] ?

thanks beforehand!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
834
2
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, [itex]a = 1/b_i[/itex] is a nonsensical expression.

[itex]a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj}[/itex] is fine, however. Divisions don't come up very often with vector quantities, though.
 
  • #3
2
0
Generally speaking, there is no summation involved if an index is not repeated on the same side of an equation. An index that is "free" (not repeated) should be free on both sides of the equation. Hence, [itex]a = 1/b_i[/itex] is a nonsensical expression.

Indeed, I'm sorry, what I wanted to write is [itex]a = 1/b_{ii}[/itex]

[itex]a_i = b_i/c_{jj} = \sum_j b_i/c_{jj}[/itex] is fine

thanks! it is clear now.
 

Related Threads on Division using index notation

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
839
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
28K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
741
Top