• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Do currents superposition

  • Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date
  • #1
1,170
3
When you work with an emf of the form:

U(t) = a0 + Ʃaicos([itex]\omega[/itex]t)
it desperately cries for using Kirchoffs law for each term in the sum independently. I guess you can do so since Kirchoffs law is linear but then other the hand I get something weird physically when doing so.
In every exercise I am told that the current has been going on forever. Applying Kirchoffs law for the current due to a0 after an infinite amount of time then shows that there is no current due to this. Which I guess makes sense because for a circuit where the only emf is generated by the constant because then after an infinite amount of there is no current because the capacitor is blocking everything because of the charge on it. But on the other hand when you then superposition this situation with a lot of other emfs that are oscillating something is weird physically- because shouldn't the "extra" charge on the capacitor arising from the constant part of the emf not give rise to a different physical situation? I mean even though there is no current due to it has produced some extra charge on the capacitor which generates a potential drop for every electron going towards the - pole. Shouldn't this somehow be accounted for?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,679
3
Please show the circuit you are referring to.
 
  • #3
1,170
3
it's a simple RC-circuit
 

Related Threads on Do currents superposition

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
23K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
726
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Top