Definition: Suppose T is an index set and for each t in T, X_t is a non-void set. Then the(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); product[itex]\Pi_{t \in T}X_t[/itex] is the collection of all "sequences" [itex]\{x_t\}_{t \in T} = \{x_t\}[/itex] where [itex]x_t \in X_t[/itex].

Does this mean that [itex]\Pi_{t\inT}X_t[/itex] is the set containing all possible sequences defined by: "i-th element is a member of the set X_i"?

And by the way, if sequences are sets of ordered elements, why aren't they noted using parentheses instead of braces? Afterall, isn't an n-tuple (x_1,...,x_n) just a set whose elements are ordered, i.e. a sequence?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Do I have this definition right? (and a suprise bonus question on sequences!)

Loading...

Similar Threads - definition right suprise | Date |
---|---|

B Is there a definition of randomness? | Dec 14, 2017 |

I Definition of "equivalent" probability problems? | Jun 25, 2017 |

I Equivalent definitions of random variable | Jan 16, 2017 |

I Partial Order - Reconciling Definitions by Garling and Goldrei | Oct 31, 2016 |

Bias of an estimator: Can you confirm that I am doing this right? | Aug 11, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**