Do individuals most often convert science?

  • #1
3,077
4
Is one person, as distinct from scientific communities, more likely to establish an revolutionary application of the scientific method; i. e., have individuals themselves shifted an existing paradigm more often and profoundly than groups of scientists?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,786
8
Very often the answer to that question is not one, but two.

Newton had to deal with competitors: Hooke had the idea for the inverse square law, and Leibniz developed Calculus independently.

Similarly Einstein was ghosted by Poincare on special relativity and by Hilbert on general relativity.

Quantum mechanics was invented independently by Heisenberg and Schroedinger. QED was invented FOUR times: by Schwinger, Tomonaga, Feynmann, and Stueckelberg! Three men got the Nobel for the electroweak theory.

Then you get into influences. Maxwell couldn't (it seems) have developed his theory without the prior work of Faraday. But everyone including Faraday agreed that he could never have done it.

Since about 1930, the rapid growth of science and mathematics have made it harder for a single individual to turn a whole field around.
 

Related Threads on Do individuals most often convert science?

  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
20K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
510
  • Last Post
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
4
Replies
98
Views
16K
Replies
16
Views
921
  • Poll
  • Last Post
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
5K
Top