Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Do photons exist or not

Tags:
  1. Dec 20, 2017 #1

    ftr

    User Avatar

    from wiki
    "Although the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering strongly suggest the existence of the photon, it might alternatively be explained by a mere quantization of emission; more definitive evidence of the quantum nature of radiation is now taken up into modern quantum optics as in the antibunching effect.[30]"

    That suggest that no individual photon has actually been observed. Is that correct?
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 20, 2017 #2

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

  4. Dec 20, 2017 #3

    ftr

    User Avatar

    Modelling seems to be different than actual physical, see my edit. That is why I started hating orthodox QM and started loving Bohmian mechanics.:biggrin:
     
  5. Dec 20, 2017 #4

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    It's not correct.
     
  6. Dec 20, 2017 #5

    ftr

    User Avatar

    I remember from many years ago in the research institute I used to work for had a million dollar ccd camera that was supposed to count photons. Do you know of an actual experiment.
     
  7. Dec 20, 2017 #6

    DrChinese

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Not sure what you would call suitable for proving the existence of photons, but this is something I consider to be good:

    Abstract:
    "... For example, while well-known phenomena such as the photoelectric effect and Compton scattering strongly suggest the existence of photons, they are not definitive proof of their existence. Here we present an experiment, suitable for an undergraduate laboratory, that unequivocally demonstrates the quantum nature of light. Spontaneously downconverted light is incident on a beamsplitter and the outputs are monitored with single-photon counting detectors. We observe a near absence of coincidence counts between the two detectors—a result inconsistent with a classical wave model of light, but consistent with a quantum descriptionin which individual photons are incident on the beamsplitter. ..."

    http://people.whitman.edu/~beckmk/QM/grangier/Thorn_ajp.pdf
     
  8. Dec 20, 2017 #7

    PeterDonis

    Staff: Mentor

    No. We have instruments that can detect individual photons in experiments. See the paper @DrChinese referenced for an example.
     
  9. Dec 20, 2017 #8
    Richard Feynman has been clear that photons exist as particles. We can hear them hitting the detector, click, click, click.
     
  10. Dec 21, 2017 #9

    ftr

    User Avatar

  11. Dec 21, 2017 #10

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    You can find opinions for every nonsense you like. That doesn’t mean they would be relevant.
    It is possible to describe the world without using the word “photons”, but you would need entities that every reasonable physicist would just call photons.
    No, it suggests some experiments from the 1930s and earlier can be described without photons. We don’t live in 1930 any more.
     
  12. Dec 21, 2017 #11

    Cthugha

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    So what is wrong about antibunching as solid evidence that it is possible to prepare single photon states? It has been demonstrated in experiments over and over again.

    A quote from that text "Photons do not exist, according to Geoff Jones of the University of Sussex. Jones believes that it is ‘wrong, and unnecessary’ to describe light in terms of small, localised particles."

    Of course it is wrong and unnecessary to describe light in terms of small localised particles. But photons are NOT small, localised particles. There have been people such as Willis Lamb who stated the opinion that the term photon is often used incorrectly and thus the terminology should be changed, but these people also clearly stated that the quantum theory of radiation is the right tool to analyze problems in quantum optics. They just think that the term "photon" is giving people a wrong bullet-like intuitive picture of what photons are - which is exactly what they are not.
     
  13. Dec 21, 2017 #12
  14. Dec 21, 2017 #13

    PeterDonis

    Staff: Mentor

    The responses to your question in the OP were not "opinions". You have been given references to actual experiments that detect photons.

    Question answered. Thread closed.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...
Similar Threads for photons exist Date
I Existence of RF Photons Oct 23, 2017
I Do photons of all energies exist? Dec 6, 2016
B Proof photons exist? Dec 4, 2015
Evidence of photon existence Apr 17, 2014
Casimir plates prevent photon existence only perpendicular to them? Feb 25, 2014