Do sattelites orbit with the rotation of the earth?

AI Thread Summary
Geostationary satellites orbit in sync with Earth's rotation, while non-geostationary satellites can orbit in any direction, although they typically follow the Earth's rotation for energy efficiency. Tracking satellites is managed through radar and databases, with collision risks considered low due to the vastness of space and the relatively small number of tracked objects. Common orbits include low Earth orbit, which allows rapid coverage of the planet, and sun-synchronous orbits, which maintain consistent sunlight for solar panels. Concerns about orbital debris in low Earth orbit are growing, as the accumulation of satellites and other objects raises questions about potential collisions and the creation of debris fields. The discussion highlights the balance between satellite deployment and the need for effective tracking to prevent collisions.
Russell_B
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hey there,

The other day i was solving a simple curvilinear motion problem that used a sattelite in orbit around the Earth as an example and it got me thinking.

If a geostationary sattelite is always above the same region of the Earth (and can only occupy an orbit of a certain altitude) it is clearly orbiting in the direction of the Earth's rotation.

But what about non-geostationary sattelites? Can they orbit in any direction? How do we keep track of all these sattelites and make sure they don't collide?

Thanks for your time
Russ
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
They can go in any direction, but usually they go with the Earth's rotation because of the lower launch energy (you get a boost due to the speed of the rotation).

How do they keep track? Radar and databases. But the odds of collision really aren't too bad since there is a lot of real-estate up there and only a few tens of thousands of objects worth tracking.
 
Russell_B said:
But what about non-geostationary sattelites? Can they orbit in any direction?
Yes, other common orbits are low Earth - takes about 90mins, satelites cover all points on earth, used by GPS and sat phones.
Or sun synchronous - satellites orbit pole to pole in a time that it is always along the day-night line, this let's you keep the solar panels in daylight and is useful for taking photographs becaus you can see shadows.

How do we keep track of all these sattelites and make sure they don't collide?
You know the orbit (assuming it doesn't deliberately maneuver) so you can predict it's position a long time in advance. You can move an object out of the way of another but this costs fuel. Mostly you just rely on space being big, satellites being relatively small and a miss being as good as a mile.
 
Mostly you just rely on space being big, satellites being relatively small and a miss being as good as a mile.
Space is big there, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_satellite_collision" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oic. I was under the impression that low Earth orbit was getting cluttered up with sattelites, discarded retrorockets, waste, dropped spanners etc. After all, we have been messing around up there for the last 50 years. Plus you might have trouble tracking the smaller annoying stuff.
 
Ha! As one in the business of putting this stuff up there, I often ask: How many satellites can be placed in low Earth orbit before a critical density is reached where one initial collision results in a low Earth orbit debris field? And will it look like the rings of Saturn in the evening sun?
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top